메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국셰익스피어학회 Shakespeare Review Shakespeare Review Vol.40 No.3
발행연도
2004.9
수록면
565 - 583 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay focuses on the fact that the relationship between Coriolanus's private meaning and the multiple value system of Roman society in Shakespeare's Roman play, Coriolanus could be associated with the political and social situation in Elizabethan and Jacobean age. When he dramatized Thomas North's translation, Plutarch's Lives whose description of the heroes is chiefly didactic and moralistic, he had transposed the original one with the Machiavellian elements by paying attention to contingent value. Shakespeare made Coriolanus a distinct individual who is obsessed with private value and meaning in this play. The play shows that there should be the profound conflict between the social condition that consists of a complex web of various perspectives and the hero who has a unique and individualistic value. Therefore, Coriolanus can be translated into a distinctive and private individual, not a figure determined by oppressive institutions and ideologies.
While the Roman scenes in the play shows a multi-layered tension in which self-interest and class values conflict each other, Coriolanus, who remains solitary in the structural tension, makes a forthright effort to achieve his self-ideal, an effort which is also a struggle to impose hierarchical order on the contingent political situation in Rome. Coriolanus sees the tribunes' and the plebeians' demand for political and economic reform as incompatible with his stanch nobility, seen not so much as a class interest but as a principle of order, decency, and intelligibility. Furthermore, his process of achieving private value shows how certain constructions of the self and certain social contingencies produce an unbridgeable gap between individual meaning and communal value. What makes Coriolanus's value ineffective is the conflict of multiple values that gives rise to the change of circumstance. However, his actions could be rationally justified in Roman society because Coriolanus has better utility in time of war than in peacetime. Although he becomes a victim of self-chosen circumstances, his indomitable effort at self-idealization in a time of transition makes his individual quality memorable.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ.
Ⅲ. 맺는 말
인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003143972