지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.6
- 수록면
- 37 - 68 (32page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the existing literature, the nature of the new democratic regime is little considered in discussing the democratic implications of economic reform in the Third World countries which have experienced democratization. It would be more helpful to understand the political nature of the new democratic regime to explore the democratic implications of economic reform. The question in point is whether the outcomes of economic reform will positively or negatively intensify or weaken the existing political nature of the new political regime. This is because its existing nature is dual, which means that it is authoritarian as well as democratic in terms of ideas, attitudes, institutions, and forces, etc.
In the new democratic regime, economic reform ultimately tends to intensify its authoritarian nature, rather than its democratic one, regardless of its outcomes, as the cases of Brazil and Argentina show. The new democratic regime has just emerged in higher modernization after a long period of authoritarian rule. The new regime is a dual - mixed and confused - political order. There has existed some authoritarian legacies and forces as well as some democratic practices, urges and forces. It is, by nature, “fragile” and unstable regime. Based upon such a regime, its government can hardly pursue reform policies consistently and systematically in a democratic way, as a majority of citizens hopes. It rather decides and implements the policies through concentration, centralization and bureaucratization of political power. As a result, economic reform tends to intensify some authoritarian elements and trends that have remained in the process of democratic transition from the authoritarian regime.
The political leader of the new democratic government tends to make use of some successful outcomes in economic reform in order to maintain and increase his own power and leadership, even by seeking to amend the existing constitution. When he fails to stabilize the economy to some extent, and to achieve some degree of economic growth, however, he and his government have little chance to survive political competition and opposition at the polls. The next governments are then determined to cope with economic instability and imbalance by concentrating, centralizing, and bureaucratizing more political power further. This ultimately tends to reinforce the authoritarian nature of the new democratic regime. In conclusion, the new democratic regime will continue to decay unless the macro-economy is stabilized and balanced through economic reforms.
In the new democratic regime, economic reform ultimately tends to intensify its authoritarian nature, rather than its democratic one, regardless of its outcomes, as the cases of Brazil and Argentina show. The new democratic regime has just emerged in higher modernization after a long period of authoritarian rule. The new regime is a dual - mixed and confused - political order. There has existed some authoritarian legacies and forces as well as some democratic practices, urges and forces. It is, by nature, “fragile” and unstable regime. Based upon such a regime, its government can hardly pursue reform policies consistently and systematically in a democratic way, as a majority of citizens hopes. It rather decides and implements the policies through concentration, centralization and bureaucratization of political power. As a result, economic reform tends to intensify some authoritarian elements and trends that have remained in the process of democratic transition from the authoritarian regime.
The political leader of the new democratic government tends to make use of some successful outcomes in economic reform in order to maintain and increase his own power and leadership, even by seeking to amend the existing constitution. When he fails to stabilize the economy to some extent, and to achieve some degree of economic growth, however, he and his government have little chance to survive political competition and opposition at the polls. The next governments are then determined to cope with economic instability and imbalance by concentrating, centralizing, and bureaucratizing more political power further. This ultimately tends to reinforce the authoritarian nature of the new democratic regime. In conclusion, the new democratic regime will continue to decay unless the macro-economy is stabilized and balanced through economic reforms.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 신민주체제와 경제개혁
Ⅲ. 브라질과 아르헨티나의 사례
Ⅳ. 결론
Abstract
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[동아시아 연구]경제위기와 민주주의-필리핀 민주화의 경우-
민주주의와 인권
2001 .04
-
민주화 과정에서 대중들의 정치적 인식: 태국사례
한국태국학회논총
2013 .01
-
인도네시아, 말레이시아, 필리핀, 태국의 정치체제 민주성 결정요인에 관한 경험분석
동남아시아연구
2006 .01
-
‘87년체제’와 민주개혁운동의 전환적 위기 : 그 원인과 대안의 탐색
시민과세계
2006 .02
-
교육에서의 87년체제 : 민주화와 신자유주의 사이에서
경제와사회
2009 .12
-
미얀마 민주화운동의 연대와 분열: 정치문화적 해석
동남아연구
2012 .01
-
Towards Consolidation : Civic Organizations and Democratic Values in Asia
국제정치논총
2006 .12
-
Reassessing Democratic Legitimacy : Toward a Multidimensional Model of Democratic Attitude
평화연구
2013 .10
-
민주화 이후 정치적 위기와 대응: 한국과 태국의 비교론적 함의
동남아시아연구
2008 .01
-
동아시아 국가들의 민주주의 교훈: 민주시민교육의 필요성
글로벌교육연구
2020 .01
-
민주적 세제개혁의 방향
시민과세계
2004 .03
-
국가폭력에 대한 저항과 아시아 민주화운동에 대한 고찰 - 광주민주화운동의 아시아권 파급효과를 중심으로 -
동북아법연구
2010 .01
-
칠레 민주 정권의 신자유주의 경제정책 : 다시 생각해보는 “성공신화”
라틴아메리카연구
2004 .12
-
정치부패의 문제와 민주주의 공고화 : 정치체제 접근
한국정치학회보
2002 .07
-
민주적 사회주의와 민주노동당의 실천
마르크스주의 연구
2004 .11
-
브라질의 신민주체제와 정치부패의 문제 : 정치체제 접근
라틴아메리카연구
2003 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
아르헨티나 경제위기의 원인과 정부의 대응 정책
이성량
국제지역연구
2003
.01
라틴아메리카에서의 대공황의 영향: 정치경제학적 접근 : 브라질과 아르헨티나의 경험을 중심으로
김우택
라틴아메리카연구
2007
.03
아르헨티나, 대공황, 그리고 민중주의
채만수
뉴 래디컬 리뷰
2002
.08
신자유주의 경제재편의 사회적 수용과 국가의 역할 : 아르헨티나 메넴 정부를 사례로
박병수
라틴아메리카연구
2004
.12
세계경제위기, 아르헨티나와 브라질의 대응 : 상이한 거시경제, 동일한 취약성
훌리오 세바레스
,
이성형
라틴아메리카이슈
2009
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-950-002767833