지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This research, centering on the OECD member countries, has taken a look at the international countermeasure against a tax haven which emerged from the latter period of the 1990s. This research began with a restrictive eye on a tax haven and harmful tax competition at first, but there appeared TIEA(Tax Information Exchange Agreement) and information exchange and transparency were emphasized in the developmental process of the research.
With more emphasis on the importance of a tax haven and information exchange after the 2008 financial crisis, OECD Global Forum is leading the stream of international taxes with its initiative in a tax haven. Through such a stream of international taxes, this research is expected to get the implications as follows
First, we cannot be optimistic about the effectiveness of immediately collecting information though we've made an agreement on a tax haven and made TIEA; however, it cannot be denied that such an agreement-making aspect becomes a catalyst to convert from an confrontational approach tax-haven-hosting countries to a conversational approach to them. TIEA-making is the first step toward interaction with a tax haven, and even from now, it is expected that TIEA-making could at least play a role of a restriction line to tax evasion using a tax haven.
Secondly, as the forum for discussing major issues of the world economy moves to G20 from G7, so is the era when OECD takes the unilateral lead in discussions gone. The more the number of the countries participating in OECE Global Forum, the more time and cost it might take for decision-making; nevertheless, OECD Global Forum is proving that such issues as tax evasion and tax avoidance could be resolved effectively only through international countermeasures.
Thirdly, in setting up our direction of tax policy against a tax haven, we shouldn't overlook the importance of TIEA. This research holds that grasping the actual condition on how other countries operate the TIEA made with tax-haven-hosting countries, and going over what role the regulations on information exchange have played in TIEA we have made up until now would be conducive to taking our course of the upcoming agreement policy.
With more emphasis on the importance of a tax haven and information exchange after the 2008 financial crisis, OECD Global Forum is leading the stream of international taxes with its initiative in a tax haven. Through such a stream of international taxes, this research is expected to get the implications as follows
First, we cannot be optimistic about the effectiveness of immediately collecting information though we've made an agreement on a tax haven and made TIEA; however, it cannot be denied that such an agreement-making aspect becomes a catalyst to convert from an confrontational approach tax-haven-hosting countries to a conversational approach to them. TIEA-making is the first step toward interaction with a tax haven, and even from now, it is expected that TIEA-making could at least play a role of a restriction line to tax evasion using a tax haven.
Secondly, as the forum for discussing major issues of the world economy moves to G20 from G7, so is the era when OECD takes the unilateral lead in discussions gone. The more the number of the countries participating in OECE Global Forum, the more time and cost it might take for decision-making; nevertheless, OECD Global Forum is proving that such issues as tax evasion and tax avoidance could be resolved effectively only through international countermeasures.
Thirdly, in setting up our direction of tax policy against a tax haven, we shouldn't overlook the importance of TIEA. This research holds that grasping the actual condition on how other countries operate the TIEA made with tax-haven-hosting countries, and going over what role the regulations on information exchange have played in TIEA we have made up until now would be conducive to taking our course of the upcoming agreement policy.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 조세피난처와 有害한 조세경쟁에 대한 OECD의 대항
Ⅲ. 조세목적의 투명성과 정보교환을 위한 OECD 노력
Ⅳ. OECD 글로벌 포럼의 영향력 및 TIEA의 확대
Ⅴ. 조세피난처에 대한 우리나라의 대응 및 방향
Ⅵ. 맺음말
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (21)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조세피난처를 이용한 조세회피와 탈세 대응방안
조세학술논집
2014 .02
-
역외탈세의 유형분석과 법적 쟁점
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2014 .12
-
해운업에 있어 조세피난처 세제의 법적 문제점에 관한 고찰
무역연구
2017 .01
-
판례분석을 통한 조세피난처 역외탈세에 관한 연구
조세학술논집
2014 .02
-
조세피난처의 이용방지에 관한 연구
법과 정책연구
2006 .06
-
국제세원관리의 문제점과 개선방안
조세학술논집
2011 .02
-
중국의 조세피난처 대책세제에 관한 비교법적 연구
조세학술논집
2010 .08
-
국제경제범죄의 처벌과 예방 -기업의 조세도피와 역외탈세를 중심으로-
비교형사법연구
2013 .01
-
해외 부동산투자와 조세문제
조세학술논집
2007 .02
-
조세조약의 남용 방지
조세학술논집
2006 .02
-
지방세법상 토지과표의 개선방안
법학연구
2005 .12
-
관세법상의 가산세에 관한 사례연구
관세학회지
2004 .02
-
조세피난처 과세제도와 그 개선방안에 관한 연구
국제회계연구
2009 .06
-
Star Company에 대한 세제상 고찰
조세학술논집
2012 .02
-
중소기업 조세지원제도의 유효성 분석
국제회계연구
2002 .11
-
부동산 취득세제 개편과 재산세제 운용방향
한국지방재정논집
2013 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-329-003687771