메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
공병혜 (조선대학교)
저널정보
질적연구학회 질적연구 질적연구 제8권 제1호
발행연도
2007.6
수록면
11 - 19 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Biomedical ethics has emerged as an antidote to the tendency to reduce the prevention and treatment of illness and suffering to a specific application of modern scientific technologies and standard marketplace strategies. Clinical Ethics is the most essential part of bioethics, there are at least 6 different methods in clinical ethics : principalism; the principle-based approach, casuistry; the case-based approach, virtue-based ethics, phenomenology. feminist ethics. The principalism, broadly used among healthcare providers, consultants, and clinical participant, is the most accepted theory of clinical ethics.
Instead of searching for useful principles or suitable paradigm-case for clinical setting, phenomenology is especially well-suited as a conceptual and methodological approach for the analysis and critique of practices and attitude that neglect the fullness of the experience of need and concern of suffering patient in clinical setting. Phenomenological approach intends to understand the original experience of the concrete situated person and its meaning in the complicated context. It end up stressing the question about how best to meet that person needs, how best to meet the kinds of skills and attitudes that caring response to those needs requires. In order to achieve it, the clinical ethicist needs an attitude change towards the phenomenological attitude, and operates an exclusion of prejudice. It can be achieved only by execution of the phenomenological method, bracketing. After the bracketing, a work of concretion of clinical situation and living in it, free space can be built for the possibility of free moving among the dilemma of clinical situation without causing any new obstruction and position-taking. Only by this, the clinical ethicist will obtain the full experience of the concrete situated person and its meaning and contextual explanation to resolve the clinical dilemma.
Phenomenological approach appeals to each reader, each student, each member of a health care profession to be more mindful ethical dimension of decision-making and actions in the healthcare setting. They are becoming aware of the needs of the concrete person striving to maintain or recover health, facing illness and death as features of human life as much as health is.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제 제기
Ⅱ. 본론
Ⅲ. 결론
Ⅳ. 참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-512-003618128