메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이상호 (한양대학교)
저널정보
한국시학회 한국시학연구 한국시학연구 제29호
발행연도
2010.12
수록면
207 - 233 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Focusing on the case of Park Mok-wol's poem, this manuscript was written for the purpose to review the matter about his released poetry work to a certain paper space already is release the same work again to a different other paper. With regard to the custom on re-inclusion of one's work, while this practice has ever been generally accepted so far without any particular objection, but because it was judged that such custom contains some problem to be seriously considered in some cases.
Mok-wol was the Poet who maintained an intense Poetic Spirit and sincere Writing Attitude, also he was extremely nervous about the Completeness of his Work. When re-adopt the same work again to a poetry book, even about the work released already to a certain paper, viewing the fact that he edited many corrections, or his confession that by his strict censoring on his own work, if those which are not suitable to the consistent standard, he did not re-adopt into the poetry book and intentionally excluded them, therefore these fact and confession back up his such Spirit. Such Mok-wol's intense Poetic Spirit and the Faithful Posture as an Artist should be respected as very precious one.
If it is so, about those works the poet had already deleted from a poetry book by himself, with regardless of the poet's real intention, the habitual practice that the future generations discover the already excluded work and re-release it again must be reconsidered. If it is intentionally excluded work by the poet, the writing principal, according to his judge that its literary value is insufficient, because the behavior which the future generations arbitrarily release the same work to a paper again without passing through any meticulous examination on the work seems not useful also to the poet. In any way, since the work is his own thing what he created, it would be said that the respect for the creator's meaning as maximum as possible is the most rationalistic and desirable.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제 제기
Ⅱ. 재수록 대상과 탈락된 작품의 간극
Ⅲ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (3)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-811-003799637