지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study examines how the United States occupied two North Korean cities during the Korean War, by comparing their civil administration systems in specific time periods: Pyeongyang from October through December, 1950 and Yangyang from June, 1951 to November 1954.
There was one clear similarity - as well as slight differences - in how America tried to occupy and govern the two areas: The US, which occupied the North with the help of the UN forces, sought to lead the local civil administration. America s goal in the course of seizing the North was to possess the highest authority in the country and establish systems to have continuing influence over the region. With a basic strategy of localizing the administration structure, the US placed it under direct control or under the management of the North Korean forces. Residents cooperated with the US and adapted to its localization policy.
Meanwhile, then the South Korean government (the President Rhee Syng-man administration) insisted on its own sovereignty over North Korea, but that was not accepted by the UN and the US. While not agreeing on the disapproval, and the UN- and US-led localization, the South Korean government had to admit realistic limitations. Alternatively, it exerted its influence via military, police, regulation and political delegations in a limited and indirect way.
There was one clear similarity - as well as slight differences - in how America tried to occupy and govern the two areas: The US, which occupied the North with the help of the UN forces, sought to lead the local civil administration. America s goal in the course of seizing the North was to possess the highest authority in the country and establish systems to have continuing influence over the region. With a basic strategy of localizing the administration structure, the US placed it under direct control or under the management of the North Korean forces. Residents cooperated with the US and adapted to its localization policy.
Meanwhile, then the South Korean government (the President Rhee Syng-man administration) insisted on its own sovereignty over North Korea, but that was not accepted by the UN and the US. While not agreeing on the disapproval, and the UN- and US-led localization, the South Korean government had to admit realistic limitations. Alternatively, it exerted its influence via military, police, regulation and political delegations in a limited and indirect way.
목차
머리말
1. 미국의 북한지역 점령정책(1950.10~12)
2. 미국의 38선 이북 ‘수복지구‘ 점령정책(1951. 6 ~ 1954. 11)
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (11)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
북한문학에 반영된 한국 현대사 연구 - 주요 역사적 사건을 통한 남북한 문학의 비교론적 관점을 중심으로 -
한국문학논총
2008 .01
-
남북한과『역사비평』 : 25년의 성과와 방향
역사비평
2012 .08
-
North Korean Industry, 1946-1950
Korea Journal
2001 .12
-
북한 6차 핵실험과 대외정책을 통해 본 남북한 교회교류 전망
신학과 목회
2017 .11
-
유엔군사령부의 ‘수복지구’ 점령 정책과 행정권 이양(1950~54)
역사비평
2008 .11
-
The Effectiveness of a Program to Train North Korean Teachers to Adjust to South Korean Society : Policy Implications for Supporting North Korean Escapees
Korea Journal
2015 .12
-
The Political and Human Rights Issues Surrounding North Korean Defectors
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2006 .03
-
북한과 중국의 미국식 인권개념에 대한 입장
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .06
-
한국전쟁기 남북한 전쟁소설의 특성-한국군과 북한군의 형상화 양상을 중심으로
한국현대문학연구
2003 .12
-
North Korean Studies in North America : A Critical Overview of Recent Trends
역사와현실
2014 .09
-
Internationalist Culture in North Korea, 1945-1950
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2008 .09
-
Whither the North Korean Nuclear Issue?
Korea Journal
2005 .12
-
교육대학 학생들의 북한 인식과 북한이해교육의 과제: 2016~2018년 「북한과 통일론」의 사례
윤리연구
2019 .01
-
1945~1948년 북한 소비조합 정책의 전개
역사와현실
2015 .06
-
대북 포용정책에 대한 북한의 인식과 대응
한국민족문화
1999 .12
-
『연세현대한국어대사전』(가칭)의 북한말 표제어 유형과 기술 방향 : 남북 언어의 접점을 찾아서
한국사전학
2005 .04
-
사회주의 ‘조선의 심장’ 평양의 동아시아 도시로의 변화 가능성
한국사연구
2007 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-911-003773798