지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article investigates the progressive achivements of the research on the North Korea’s history and the South-North relations, published in <Critical Review of History> for 25 years and reveals about its meanings.
In the late 1980s and early 1990s the North Korean studies, deviated from view of the Cold War, increased under the influence of “Awareness movement of North orea”. Accordingly, distorted knowledge about the North Korea’s history could be corrected considerably. In the 1990s with review of socialist system North Korean history studies were attracted to attention with the inflow of historical data and documents in the United States and Russia and etc. In addition, some researchers conducted a series of debates about North Korea research methodology.
In the early and mid 2000s, North Korea research was developed and further intensified by North-South reconciliation. However, since the late 2000s the North Korean study lost its overall vitality and fell back into recession with the deterioration of South-North relations.
<Critical Review of History> should continue to lead the North Korea’s history research and produce excellent research through systematic planning. It needs to meet the demands of the times on North Korean problems and North-South relations.
In the late 1980s and early 1990s the North Korean studies, deviated from view of the Cold War, increased under the influence of “Awareness movement of North orea”. Accordingly, distorted knowledge about the North Korea’s history could be corrected considerably. In the 1990s with review of socialist system North Korean history studies were attracted to attention with the inflow of historical data and documents in the United States and Russia and etc. In addition, some researchers conducted a series of debates about North Korea research methodology.
In the early and mid 2000s, North Korea research was developed and further intensified by North-South reconciliation. However, since the late 2000s the North Korean study lost its overall vitality and fell back into recession with the deterioration of South-North relations.
<Critical Review of History> should continue to lead the North Korea’s history research and produce excellent research through systematic planning. It needs to meet the demands of the times on North Korean problems and North-South relations.
목차
북한의 재인식: ‘북한바로알기’
냉전해체와 북한연구의 진화
남북화해 시기
남북관계의 침체와 현실 문제
북한 관련 연구의 문제점과 지향
참고문헌 (62)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-905-003298767