지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The primary purpose of this paper is to describe the grammar of Gyeongbuk dialect in japanese imperialism period. We checked up on the matter that the grammar of dialect change diachronically through linguistic materials of Gyeongbuk dialect in this paper.
There are the articles as ‘-i, -iga, -manchi, -bodam, -maero, -kkeojeong, -kang, -eullang, -eullo’ and connective endings as ‘-eogajiko/gajuko/ga’ in Gyeongbuk dialect at that time. These articles and connective endings had been widely used from japanese imperialism period to nowaday's Gyeongbuk dialects. The connective ending ‘-eoga’ is formed by the grammaticalization of verb ‘gajida’. We presumed to be about eighteenth century the period of grammaticalization on this connective ending. And there are final endings ‘-go/ga, -no/na, -eungo/ga, -eulkko/kka, -eungio, -eungyo’ in Gyeongbuk dialect at that time. These final endings had been widely used to nowaday's Gyeongbuk dialect. We presumed to be about the period that the final ending ‘-eungyo’ is formed by the contraction of ‘-eungio’ in the nineteen-thirties.
The auxiliary structure ‘-go jeopda’ and ‘-eun/neun gapda’ had been used in Gyeongbuk dialects at that time. These are still in existence to nowaday's Gyeongbuk dialects. But the auxiliary structure ‘-eun/neun ga bo da’ had mingled with ‘-eun/neun gapda’ in japanese imperialism period. These present state of thing is used unitary auxiliary structure ‘-eun/neun gapda’ by the grammaticalization of verb ‘boda’ at that time already. The auxiliary structure ‘-go jeopda’ of Gyeongbuk dialects is be equivalent to ‘-go sipda’ of the central district dialect. The methods of tense expression and negation expression did not change these grammatical forms between nowaday's and at that time in this dialects. The method of tense expression ‘an+predicate’ always had the better to the method of tense expression ‘ji+anihada’ in japanese imperialism period and nowaday's. There are not so much difference between wordformation methods of japanese imperialism period dialects and that of nowaday's dialects. The wordformation methods ‘X+ropda’ and ‘X+hada’ had the better of the method ‘X+seureopda’ and ‘X+georida/deoda’ in japanese imperialism period dialects.
There are the articles as ‘-i, -iga, -manchi, -bodam, -maero, -kkeojeong, -kang, -eullang, -eullo’ and connective endings as ‘-eogajiko/gajuko/ga’ in Gyeongbuk dialect at that time. These articles and connective endings had been widely used from japanese imperialism period to nowaday's Gyeongbuk dialects. The connective ending ‘-eoga’ is formed by the grammaticalization of verb ‘gajida’. We presumed to be about eighteenth century the period of grammaticalization on this connective ending. And there are final endings ‘-go/ga, -no/na, -eungo/ga, -eulkko/kka, -eungio, -eungyo’ in Gyeongbuk dialect at that time. These final endings had been widely used to nowaday's Gyeongbuk dialect. We presumed to be about the period that the final ending ‘-eungyo’ is formed by the contraction of ‘-eungio’ in the nineteen-thirties.
The auxiliary structure ‘-go jeopda’ and ‘-eun/neun gapda’ had been used in Gyeongbuk dialects at that time. These are still in existence to nowaday's Gyeongbuk dialects. But the auxiliary structure ‘-eun/neun ga bo da’ had mingled with ‘-eun/neun gapda’ in japanese imperialism period. These present state of thing is used unitary auxiliary structure ‘-eun/neun gapda’ by the grammaticalization of verb ‘boda’ at that time already. The auxiliary structure ‘-go jeopda’ of Gyeongbuk dialects is be equivalent to ‘-go sipda’ of the central district dialect. The methods of tense expression and negation expression did not change these grammatical forms between nowaday's and at that time in this dialects. The method of tense expression ‘an+predicate’ always had the better to the method of tense expression ‘ji+anihada’ in japanese imperialism period and nowaday's. There are not so much difference between wordformation methods of japanese imperialism period dialects and that of nowaday's dialects. The wordformation methods ‘X+ropda’ and ‘X+hada’ had the better of the method ‘X+seureopda’ and ‘X+georida/deoda’ in japanese imperialism period dialects.
목차
Abstract
1. 머리말
2. 경북 방언의 문법
3. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
백신애 소설에 나타나는 경북 방언
우리말글
2008 .12
-
이상화 시어에 나타나는 경북 방언
우리말글
2007 .12
-
서남방언의 하위방언구획과 네트워크 분석
언어학
2017 .04
-
현진건 소설의 방언 연구
국어국문학
2006 .05
-
현진건 소설에 나타난 경북 방언(1)
우리말글
2004 .08
-
이병각 작품에 나타난 경북 방언
어문연구
2006 .01
-
울진 방언과 삼척 방언의 음운 체계 연구
우리말연구
2013 .01
-
현진건 소설에 나타난 경북 방언의 어휘
우리말글
2005 .12
-
방언 변화와 방언 연구의 방향
한국어학
2003 .11
-
새로 발굴한 경북의성지역어의 어휘
국어교육연구
2016 .02
-
지역어의 역할과 현실대응
어문론총
2019 .01
-
서울 거주 방언 화자의 코드 선택 양상 - 20∼30대 경상도 출신 방언 화자를 중심으로 -
언어사실과 관점
2016 .01
-
계량적 연구를 통해 본 중국 방언의 분리와 통합
중어중문학
2004 .06
-
북한의 방전구획에 대한 고찰
한국학연구
2001 .11
-
20세기 수도권 지역어 연구에서 신방언 개념 도입의 필요성 : 방언 평준화 현상을 중심으로
한국어학
2007 .08
-
국어사전과 방언의 정보화
국어문학
2016 .03
-
남원 방언 문법 형태와 사용 양상 변화 연구 : 세대 차이 및 방언 의식 변화에 따라
국제언어문학
2017 .08
-
방언 교육과 시 교육 내용 연계 방향 연구
우리말글
2014 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-710-003764645