지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is aimed at examining the characteristics and hierarchy of the discourses of modernity in Korean poetics. Although Korean discourses of modernity have a great variety of aspects, they actually have three different hierarchies; formalist modernity, introspective modernity, non-modernist modernity.
Formalist modernity discourses place the focus on the aspect of modernization. It is very sensitive to the landscape of cities: buildings, arcade, crowds in the street etc. A lot of poets, like Kim Gi-rim, Kim Gwang-gyun, asserts that modern poetry must reflects this aspect. They were fond of using concepts like as ‘thought of style’, ‘ideology of sense’.
Introspective modernity discourses focus on modern citizen's inner world like as a feeling of uneasiness, alienation. Kim Gwang-sub is one of poets emphasized the importance of this modernity. He found the similarity between world modernity and Korean one in this aspect.
Non-modernist modernity discourses focus on the essence of literature in general modernity, not in modernist modernity. Although they are very especial modernity discourses, we must recognize them as one of modernity discourses. Some critics like as Han Sik emphasized the importance of this modernity.
Formalist modernity discourses place the focus on the aspect of modernization. It is very sensitive to the landscape of cities: buildings, arcade, crowds in the street etc. A lot of poets, like Kim Gi-rim, Kim Gwang-gyun, asserts that modern poetry must reflects this aspect. They were fond of using concepts like as ‘thought of style’, ‘ideology of sense’.
Introspective modernity discourses focus on modern citizen's inner world like as a feeling of uneasiness, alienation. Kim Gwang-sub is one of poets emphasized the importance of this modernity. He found the similarity between world modernity and Korean one in this aspect.
Non-modernist modernity discourses focus on the essence of literature in general modernity, not in modernist modernity. Although they are very especial modernity discourses, we must recognize them as one of modernity discourses. Some critics like as Han Sik emphasized the importance of this modernity.
목차
1. 근대성 담론 연구의 의미와 한계
2. 초기 담론에서 근대성의 의미
3. 현대시 관련 근대성 담론의 층위
4. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (38)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-810-004171316