메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
구태헌 (상지대학교)
저널정보
새한영어영문학회 새한영어영문학 새한영어영문학 제53권 2호
발행연도
2011.5
수록면
27 - 47 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
‘The American Sublime’ can be said to be a poetic genealogy mixed with Bloom’s subject-centered thought and theory of influence. Especially, two decisive stages in Bloom’s theory of influence, ‘daemonization’ and ‘Askesis,’ are used to explain how strong poets in the American tradition come to clear creative space for themselves. However, Bloom’s theory of influence and sublime seems to fail in understanding new aspects of the American sublime which creates a site of passage or a confluence between the self and nature, because his theory itself was greatly influenced by the western theories of sublime such as Kant’s ‘negative sublime’ and Freud’s ‘uncanny’ which focus on the confrontation with objects.
Most of all, “I am nothing” in Emerson’s “Nature” reads as expressing a discontinuity with everything that is anterior and an identification with the father god by Bloom, but this reading misses the fact that in this scene, the self exists in the flow of objects and becomes a part of it instead of confronting the threat of objects and overcoming it through stronger will. Of course, Stevens doesn’t believe that this Emersonian sublime, where I become a part of nature, is possible and human can stay in such an innocent time. Therefore, he tries to create an innocent moment in a fictional world by repeating making metaphor or poetry. This continuous making-poetry process can be one of the sublime moments possible in modern times.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-840-000614154