지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As Wolfhart Pannenberg points out, the doctrine of prayer has rarely become a subject of serious theological investigations. Pentecostalism has not yet produced a comprehensive and coherent conceptual analysis of its own understanding of prayer either, despite its heavy indebtedness to the practice of prayer both in its theological and historical development. The thesis of this essay is that Pentecostal theology nevertheless has much to contribute to the theology of prayer, especially with the aid of its pneumatology that integrates seemingly conflicting factors within Christian understanding of prayer.
There is a wrongheaded “either/or question” in the doctrine of prayer. That is, one tends to opt one over the other between petitionary prayer and “prayer of obedience.” The former refers to a prayer that asks something from God, while the latter a prayer that conforms to God’s will. Theologians such as A. Ritschl and W. Herrmann presents prayer of thanksgiving, a type of “prayer of obedience,” as the one and only genuine kind of prayer, thus significantly downplaying petitionary prayer. Pentecostal theology refuses to narrow down the doctrine of prayer in either way between these two types of prayer. Such a standpoint is deeply rooted in the identity of Pentecostalism.
Pentecostal emphasis on the person and the work of the Holy Spirit leads to two prominent Pentecostal prayers that have strong pneumatological implications: prayer in tongue and prayer for healing. While prayer for healing is a petitionary prayer, prayer in tongue has characteristics of “prayer of obedience” in that it minimizes the initiative of the human person who prays. Prayer in tongue blocks the possibility of disobedience by conforming the human faculty of language to the utterances given by the Holy Spirit. While Pentecostal prayer for healing often makes an insisting and even aggressive kind of petitionary prayer, prayer in tongue presupposes yielding of the human language as the pinnacle expression of human will, before the initiative of the Holy Spirit. Pentecostal theology has never attempted to choose between prayer for healing and prayer in tongue. In other words, Pentecostalism has always embraced both petitionary prayer and “prayer of obedience,” inspired by its understanding of the work of the Holy Spirit. Pentecostal pneumatology thus makes an adequate theological locus that nurtures a genuinely integrative doctrine of prayer.
There is a wrongheaded “either/or question” in the doctrine of prayer. That is, one tends to opt one over the other between petitionary prayer and “prayer of obedience.” The former refers to a prayer that asks something from God, while the latter a prayer that conforms to God’s will. Theologians such as A. Ritschl and W. Herrmann presents prayer of thanksgiving, a type of “prayer of obedience,” as the one and only genuine kind of prayer, thus significantly downplaying petitionary prayer. Pentecostal theology refuses to narrow down the doctrine of prayer in either way between these two types of prayer. Such a standpoint is deeply rooted in the identity of Pentecostalism.
Pentecostal emphasis on the person and the work of the Holy Spirit leads to two prominent Pentecostal prayers that have strong pneumatological implications: prayer in tongue and prayer for healing. While prayer for healing is a petitionary prayer, prayer in tongue has characteristics of “prayer of obedience” in that it minimizes the initiative of the human person who prays. Prayer in tongue blocks the possibility of disobedience by conforming the human faculty of language to the utterances given by the Holy Spirit. While Pentecostal prayer for healing often makes an insisting and even aggressive kind of petitionary prayer, prayer in tongue presupposes yielding of the human language as the pinnacle expression of human will, before the initiative of the Holy Spirit. Pentecostal theology has never attempted to choose between prayer for healing and prayer in tongue. In other words, Pentecostalism has always embraced both petitionary prayer and “prayer of obedience,” inspired by its understanding of the work of the Holy Spirit. Pentecostal pneumatology thus makes an adequate theological locus that nurtures a genuinely integrative doctrine of prayer.
목차
Ⅰ. 기도론과 오순절 신학
Ⅱ. 기도론의 교의학적 위치와 참된 기도의 조건
Ⅲ. 겟세마네적인 기도 : 오순절적 성령론과 방언기도
Ⅳ. 산을 옮기는 기도 : 오순절적 성령론과 청원기도
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
기도의 영성 형성에 관한 연구
대학과 선교
2010 .01
-
기도의 신학 : 우리의 기도에 응답하시는 하나님
장신논단
2003 .06
-
구약성서와 기도 : “우리”의 고백기도(애 3:40-47; 느 9:32-38)를 통해 본 성서적 기도
신학연구
2015 .12
-
아빌라의 성녀 데레사의 전망에 따른 기도 단계: I. 능동적 단계
신학과 철학
2011 .01
-
오순절 신학의 성령이해
오순절 신학 논단
2010 .12
-
Prayer for the Kingdom of God and Spiritual Calmness: A Constructive Study on Schleiermacher’s Theology of Prayer
한국조직신학논총
2011 .01
-
통전적 기도 교육론
신학연구
1999 .07
-
What do You Pray about? : The Effect of Prayer on Political Participation
Asian Journal of Religion and Society
2011 .04
-
신약성서에 나타난 기도와 신관
피어선 신학 논단
2016 .02
-
깊은 영의 기도와 영성개발
신학과 복음
2016 .11
-
관상 기도의 현대적 이해
장신논단
2007 .12
-
기도 : 종교심리학적 이해
신학논단
2003 .05
-
개혁주의생명신학과 기도의 신학
생명과 말씀
2019 .01
-
기도에 대한 성서적 신학적 고찰
신학과세계
1992 .06
-
아빌라의 성녀 데레사의 영성에 따른 기도 단계: II. 수동적 단계
신학과 철학
2012 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-236-000554726