지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
2007 revised National Curriculum by Ministry of Education, Science and Technology was revised again in 2009, the itemized details for ‘History’ subject was amended in 2010. From 2011, newly revised curriculum for history turned out to have undesirable affects on history education. They are summarized as below.
First, formerly separate subjects known as ‘National History’ and ‘Korean Contemporary History’ are unified as ‘Korean History’. But in the process of the integration, ‘Korean Contemporary History’ has sharply cut down and ‘Economic History’, ‘Social Science’ and ‘Cultural History’ have particularly not been dealt at all.
Second, ‘Korean History’ has been decided to be taught 5 times a week, which means less history education than before. The 7th National Curriculum demanded to complete 200 hours of ‘National History’ and ‘Korean Contemporary History’, but 2009 revised National Curriculum notifies 85 hours of course completion for ‘Korean History’.
Third, with introduction of intensive course completion, ‘Korean History’ course is completed within a semester, therefore resulting in growing number of students who give up to complete the course.
The government is taking on the plan to make ‘Korean history’ as a required subject. However, for ‘Korean History’ to be taught successfully in high schools, making the subject as compulsory is not the critical issue. To genuinely reinforce Korean history education, it would be more crucial to make all the test applicants for National Academic Aptitude Test take ‘Korean History’ test.
First, formerly separate subjects known as ‘National History’ and ‘Korean Contemporary History’ are unified as ‘Korean History’. But in the process of the integration, ‘Korean Contemporary History’ has sharply cut down and ‘Economic History’, ‘Social Science’ and ‘Cultural History’ have particularly not been dealt at all.
Second, ‘Korean History’ has been decided to be taught 5 times a week, which means less history education than before. The 7th National Curriculum demanded to complete 200 hours of ‘National History’ and ‘Korean Contemporary History’, but 2009 revised National Curriculum notifies 85 hours of course completion for ‘Korean History’.
Third, with introduction of intensive course completion, ‘Korean History’ course is completed within a semester, therefore resulting in growing number of students who give up to complete the course.
The government is taking on the plan to make ‘Korean history’ as a required subject. However, for ‘Korean History’ to be taught successfully in high schools, making the subject as compulsory is not the critical issue. To genuinely reinforce Korean history education, it would be more crucial to make all the test applicants for National Academic Aptitude Test take ‘Korean History’ test.
목차
1. 서언
2. 교육과정 변화와 〈국사〉 과목
3. 집중이수제의 문제점
4. 대학수학능력시험에서 〈국사〉 과목의 변천과 영향
5. 제언
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-374-000557135