지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to analyze the structure of decision making at the 2009 revised national history curriculum and the real state of its developing procedure. In addition, I suggest the improvement direction for the current decision making system.
As a result, I confirmed the developing procedure look to the direction that do not coincide with the reality of history education because of the contradictions of the decision-making structure, political inclination of only a few of history curriculum committeemen and presses, statesmen. Especially, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology’s one-sided procedure of in changing the wording by excluding advisors and researchers can not escape reasonable criticisms. Ultimately, this confusion makes teachers difficult to give nomal history lessons and pupils learn history systematically. Therefore, we need to build the structure of automous decision making, regardless of political and external pressure. We also need to continue to monitor the voice of the field of education, to improve the suitability of the curriculum. Finally, in order to prevent the confusion of the field of education, our curriculum should not be amended from time to time in the division system of the Korean Peninsula.
As a result, I confirmed the developing procedure look to the direction that do not coincide with the reality of history education because of the contradictions of the decision-making structure, political inclination of only a few of history curriculum committeemen and presses, statesmen. Especially, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology’s one-sided procedure of in changing the wording by excluding advisors and researchers can not escape reasonable criticisms. Ultimately, this confusion makes teachers difficult to give nomal history lessons and pupils learn history systematically. Therefore, we need to build the structure of automous decision making, regardless of political and external pressure. We also need to continue to monitor the voice of the field of education, to improve the suitability of the curriculum. Finally, in order to prevent the confusion of the field of education, our curriculum should not be amended from time to time in the division system of the Korean Peninsula.
목차
1. 序言
2. 역사 교육과정 意思決定의 構造와 亂脈相
3. ‘2009 개정 역사 敎育課程’ 개발 과정의 虛實
4. ‘2009 개정 역사 敎育課程’ 의사결정의 파행
5. 結語: 의사결정 구조의 개선 방향
참고문헌
참고문헌 (44)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-374-000542750