메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박소현 (한국문화관광연구원)
저널정보
현대미술사학회 현대미술사연구 현대미술사연구 제29집
발행연도
2011.6
수록면
211 - 237 (27page)

이용수

DBpia Top 1%동일한 주제분류 기준으로
최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The relationship between museum and society has been one of the most important subjects in the field of museology and art history. The new museology was an expression of such long concern but a critical approach to the established museology, which centered on the socio-ontological problems of museum rather than technical and methodological problems. ICOM’s newest slogan “social harmony” is also a product of such an socioontological turn triggered by the new museology.
By the way, what is new museology? How the new museology changed the relationship between museum and society? The New Museology(1989) edited by Peter Vergo has been generally understood as the declamation of new museology, but the range of new museology is not limited to this one origin or practice but includes multiple and interdisciplinary thoughts and practices all around the world. So I intended to revisit the new museology with various approaches and practices that I interpreted with three kinds; first, museum as social metaphor characterized by the expansion of market principle, second, the ubiquity of museum power which penetrates everywhere through the sociopolitics of gaze, especially with Tony Bennett’s Foucauldian museum visitor studies and Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett’s concept of museum effect from anthropological approach, third, new museology as a social movement that has been actively discussed in Latin America and created new community-based museum models.
I think the recent ICOM’s slogan“ social harmony” is the mixed product of those different new museologies, and so it has no choice but to including conflicting and inconsistent issues within itself. Therefore, I think we have to scrutinize those complex new museological practices because we live in the age when the social engagement of museum is demanded more intensively than ever before and the raison d’etre of museum will be located in the social relationship more and more. This literature is a kind of introduction for such a scrutinizing and needs a lot of follow-up studies, for example, the community-based new museologies that is more important contemporary issue than anything else, which will open up interdisciplinary areas between museology and art history.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론: ‘사회적 조화’라는 슬로건의 등장
Ⅱ. 신박물관학의 대두와 사회적 은유로서의 박물관
Ⅲ. 푸코적 전환과 사회적 통치기구로서의 박물관
Ⅳ. 박물관 권력의 편재성: 박물관 판옵티콘의 시각 정치
Ⅴ. 또 다른 경로: 사회를 변화시키는 박물관, 사회운동으로서의 박물관학
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-609-000575486