지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Franchises can take advantage of other person's capital and competent person for franchiser and unfold business rapidly. Also, franchisee utilizes brand or know-how etc. that franchiser offers and have characteristic that can start separatively.
Therefore, many businessman who utilize franchises business are entering newly to market of wide field. In the meantime, as business activity that use franchises increases, dispute that enclose franchise agreement between franchiser and franchisee businessman is increasing. Accordingly, our country established “Law about fair of affiliation business transaction” at May, 2002, and introduced system that require system that register open three of information and system that do affiliation money do salute and franchise agreement's renewal at August, 2007.
On the other hand, Japan is endeavoring to prevent dispute about franchise as the United States of America and control this, but legislation of general law is not consisting up to now. Dispute about franchise agreement of Japan is arising to problem that receive relief that person concerned is administration of justice through court than Fair Trade Commission.
Franchise agreement is prescribing about binding about franchisee mainly here as continuous transaction contract that promise various kinds right and relation of duty between franchiser and franchisee. But, method is various about binding, and also, because there is much kinds in franchise's types of business or personality of franchise business, it argues by to weigh the difference or may speak that decent thing is impossible. But, because many binding articles are prescribed in franchise agreement thus, need to examine circumspectly whether it is possible that franchiser restricts franchisee to where. Also, is ?Unfair trade practices’ general appointment’ that it takes spare ?Unfair trade practices’ prohibition’ of Anti Trust Law article 19, justice regulation of ?Unfair trade practices’ of same law article 2 9 clauses and these contents that control this point.
Therefore, because Anti Trust Law's standard is made out at September 20, 1983 to administer franchise business, pronounced Fair Trade Commission's “Anti Trust Law's guide la about franchise system” is unique. Therefore, need to consider Anti Trust Law's regulation always that administer interpretation and correction of franchise agreement article and franchise fledgling as for franchiser and confirm carefully binding to some measure is reasonable and proper thing.
Therefore, many businessman who utilize franchises business are entering newly to market of wide field. In the meantime, as business activity that use franchises increases, dispute that enclose franchise agreement between franchiser and franchisee businessman is increasing. Accordingly, our country established “Law about fair of affiliation business transaction” at May, 2002, and introduced system that require system that register open three of information and system that do affiliation money do salute and franchise agreement's renewal at August, 2007.
On the other hand, Japan is endeavoring to prevent dispute about franchise as the United States of America and control this, but legislation of general law is not consisting up to now. Dispute about franchise agreement of Japan is arising to problem that receive relief that person concerned is administration of justice through court than Fair Trade Commission.
Franchise agreement is prescribing about binding about franchisee mainly here as continuous transaction contract that promise various kinds right and relation of duty between franchiser and franchisee. But, method is various about binding, and also, because there is much kinds in franchise's types of business or personality of franchise business, it argues by to weigh the difference or may speak that decent thing is impossible. But, because many binding articles are prescribed in franchise agreement thus, need to examine circumspectly whether it is possible that franchiser restricts franchisee to where. Also, is ?Unfair trade practices’ general appointment’ that it takes spare ?Unfair trade practices’ prohibition’ of Anti Trust Law article 19, justice regulation of ?Unfair trade practices’ of same law article 2 9 clauses and these contents that control this point.
Therefore, because Anti Trust Law's standard is made out at September 20, 1983 to administer franchise business, pronounced Fair Trade Commission's “Anti Trust Law's guide la about franchise system” is unique. Therefore, need to consider Anti Trust Law's regulation always that administer interpretation and correction of franchise agreement article and franchise fledgling as for franchiser and confirm carefully binding to some measure is reasonable and proper thing.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 프랜차이즈 계약에 관한 규제
Ⅲ. 프랜차이즈 계약과 독점금지법
Ⅳ. 프랜차이즈 계약의 유형별 검토
Ⅴ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (40)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
가맹사업법의 최근 쟁점과 개선방안
경쟁법연구
2018 .01
-
가맹사업 공정화를 위한 지역정책 연구
정책연구
2016 .10
-
프랜차이즈 계약에서의 仲裁條項
중재연구
2004 .01
-
프랜차이즈의 국제화와 가맹사업법의 문제점
경영법률
2008 .01
-
동북아 경제중심 국가에 따른 프랜차이즈 (가맹사업) 법제 정비 방향
경영법률
2012 .01
-
프랜차이즈 가맹본부의 경영전략: 정보공개서 자료 분석을 중심으로
기업경영연구
2015 .01
-
가맹계약에서의 정보제공의무에 관한 연구
기업법연구
2004 .12
-
가맹금의 개념과 정의조항
고려법학
2010 .01
-
How to Resolve Disputes between Franchise Headquarters and Franchisee (through Case Study)
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
2020 .09
-
中國에 있어서 프랜차이즈에 대한 法規制의 現況과 改善方向
경영법률
2010 .01
-
외식 프랜차이즈산업의 가맹점 만족도에 관한 연구
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
2000 .09
-
분쟁사례를 통해본 프랜차이즈 시스템의 개선방안
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
2001 .09
-
“가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률”의 쟁점에 관한 고찰
기업법연구
2011 .03
-
加盟事業去來에서의 情報公開制度
법학연구
2003 .06
-
Ownership Structure and Relation between Franchiser and Franchisee : A Review and Discussion
호텔경영학연구
2001 .08
-
국제가맹계약시 당사자의 주요의무에 대한 소고
무역상무연구
2011 .08
-
프랜차이즈 가맹점주의 근로자성 - 편의점 가맹점주의 근로기준법상 근로자성 검토를 중심으로 -
법학논집
2019 .01
-
외식 프랜차이즈 창업자 환경이 가맹 본부 조건과 신뢰,계약 의사에 관한 연구
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
2010 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000498242