지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper dealt with the discovery of electronically stored information(hereinafter referred to as ESI) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure(hereinafter referred to as FRCP) in USA. The number of ESI as a civil or criminal evidence has been increased greatly in court. According to this situation, USA amended FRCP to introduce the rule about ESI effective in 12.1. 2006. Because of the confusion of the definition of ESI during the short period, there have been many legal problems surrounding ESI. Also Korea may be influenced on by USA civil procedure law due to the Free Trade Agreement article 18 with USA. Sooner or later Korea will have to review Korea’s civil procedure law to harmonize USA FRCP. The foregoing reason is the primary motive to study this subject. This paper is divided into 3 parts to write what I want to express effectively. This paper contains main issues in second part. It introduces the concept of ESI, discovery procedure based on USC 28, FRCP, court’s case regarding USA 28, FRCP34, and comparison FRCP and Korea civil procedure law. The detailed summary of the main part in this paper is the following; the difficulty of the definition of ESI because of its changing and developing character, which is impossible to identify and decide the scope of discovery. The case introduced in this paper is Columbia Pictures vs. Burnell, Case No. CV 06-1093 in the Central District of California held by USA district court which ordered discovery of random access memory (RAM). Most people do not think of RAM as being part of a computer’s storage because most types of RAM lose their data when the computer powers down. It might not easy to include RAM as a ESI stipulated by FRCP34. From this case this paper explained how often the legal issues on ESI happen because of its unclear concept, and in the end the role of the courts will be great and have to do their best in initiating the discovery process. USA discovery system reflects democracy government depending the many parts of the process on parties instead of court’s supervision or intervention. The role of Court in USA is just like umpire in sports game distinguished from Korea civil process which is held by the Court entirely. This paper showed how USA and Korea civil procedure law is different and concluded that we have to consider both good point and undesirable point of USA civil procedure when we have to decide whether we adopt USA discovery procedure or not. Finally this paper emphasized on preparation for legal issues around ESI incoming future to cooperate with the trends of international integration in civil procedure law.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 전자문서의 증거개시 절차
Ⅲ. Case를 통해 본 전자문서 증거개시의 중요한 법적 이슈(전자문서의 보존범위와 관련해서)
Ⅳ. 위 사건이 우리나라 법원에서 제기되었을 경우 적용상 문제점 및 대안
Ⅴ. 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
미국법상의 Discovery 제도의 도입 필요성
법학연구
2005 .06
-
우리 民事訴訟法의 沿革에 관하여
고려법학
2009 .01
-
전자증거개시제도(E-Discovery)에 관한 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2011 .12
-
형사소송법상 증거개시제도에 대한 법적 소고 : 헌법적 평가 및 미국제도와 비교하여
한양법학
2009 .02
-
미국 연방 민사소송규칙상의 전자적 자료의 증거개시에 관한 연구
비교사법
2008 .12
-
환경지속성지수(ESI) 추계의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구
국토연구
2003 .12
-
형사절차상 전자증거개시제도(E-Discovery)의 증거개시 신청 방식에 관한 연구
형사정책연구
2018 .12
-
The Status and Application of OR in USA
한국경영과학회지
1976 .12
-
경제심리지수(ESI) 개선 방안 연구
[BOK] 국민계정리뷰
2018 .12
-
세도나 캐나다 원칙상 전자증거개시제도의 준비에 관한 실무상의 문제점
법학연구
2015 .09
-
Career Education in USA
한국진로교육학회 학술대회지
2010 .05
-
美國의 「法의 날」을 맞이하여
저스티스
1963 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000706132