지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
"Project losses" refer to losses incurred outside of the project site area after implementation or completion of a public project. It was understood before that only losses that directly resulted from public uses would be compensated. Therefore, project losses (i.e. losses, such as obstruction of sunshine/scenery, noise, vibration, dust, drying up of water, etc., are treated differently from compensation for taking land and other direct losses) were not traditionally eligible for compensation in principle.
In public projects today, aside from direct infringement of rights from taking of properties, the number of complaints filed not for compensation for direct losses but for project losses that are more indirect losses/damages from execution public projects on the rise.
However, regulations only provide for compensation for land taking and other such direct losses and there are no regulations thatprovide for losses incurred outside of project sites in spite of clear material damages to properties. In the absence of these regulations, such losses/damages are rarely properly compensated.
Disputes between people and project executors occur frequently because of this and often leads to long delays in public projects. Even when damages/losses are compensated, there is no consistency in compensation owing to the different regulations applied by the project executors.
In view of the recent developments, the conclusion that is reached is that there are no actual benefits to be gained from deciding whether losses are within the scope of compensation for losses or for damages. For efficient remedy of the victim's rights resulting from project losses, it would be more useful and advantageous to include them in the scope of compensation for losses.
For these reasons, consideration should be given to compensations before damage has occurred when losses from a project are clearly anticipated in order to ensure smooth execution of public projects and efficient remedies of infringement to property rights.
There needs to be consistent regulations or rules on compensations to reduce burden on officials in charge of compensation and to ensure consistency in compensated amounts. In addition, scopes and standards of compensation for losses outside of the project area needs to be established before the said tasks can be undertaken.
In public projects today, aside from direct infringement of rights from taking of properties, the number of complaints filed not for compensation for direct losses but for project losses that are more indirect losses/damages from execution public projects on the rise.
However, regulations only provide for compensation for land taking and other such direct losses and there are no regulations thatprovide for losses incurred outside of project sites in spite of clear material damages to properties. In the absence of these regulations, such losses/damages are rarely properly compensated.
Disputes between people and project executors occur frequently because of this and often leads to long delays in public projects. Even when damages/losses are compensated, there is no consistency in compensation owing to the different regulations applied by the project executors.
In view of the recent developments, the conclusion that is reached is that there are no actual benefits to be gained from deciding whether losses are within the scope of compensation for losses or for damages. For efficient remedy of the victim's rights resulting from project losses, it would be more useful and advantageous to include them in the scope of compensation for losses.
For these reasons, consideration should be given to compensations before damage has occurred when losses from a project are clearly anticipated in order to ensure smooth execution of public projects and efficient remedies of infringement to property rights.
There needs to be consistent regulations or rules on compensations to reduce burden on officials in charge of compensation and to ensure consistency in compensated amounts. In addition, scopes and standards of compensation for losses outside of the project area needs to be established before the said tasks can be undertaken.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 사업손실보상의 개요
Ⅲ. 현행 사업손실 보상제도
Ⅳ. 사업손실보상의 권리구제와 평가
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
사업손실보상제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구
주거환경
2008 .12
-
공법상 영업손실보상의 개선방안에 관한 연구
도시행정학보
2012 .03
-
국가 행정측면에서의 보상체계의 구분과 예방접종사고보상의 법률관계
한양법학
2008 .06
-
K.O.R.E.A. PROJECT
한국관광레저학회 학술발표대회
2017 .06
-
손실보상제도의 한·중·일 비교법적 연구
아시아연구
2012 .06
-
과실불법행위로 인한 경제적 손해의 배상- 대법원 1996. 1. 26, 94다5472 (소위 송전케이블 사안)의 평석 -
법학논집
2011 .01
-
生活權補償
법학논총
2007 .08
-
공공부문 IS 개발 프로젝트 손실요인에 대한 현장연구: 프로젝트 관리를 중심으로
한국IT서비스학회지
2004 .01
-
우리나라 어업손실 보상제도에 대한 정선방안 연구;-법제도를 중심으로-
수산경영론집
1994 .01
-
손실보상 행정제도 개선에 따른 공익사업 활성화 방안에 관한 연구
주거환경
2018 .12
-
생활보상의 이론과 실제
행정법연구
2009 .08
-
소음ㆍ진동 피해에 대한 사업손실보상의 범위와 기준에 관한 연구
국토연구
2006 .09
-
품질손실의 계량적 접근방법에 관한 연구
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2009 .05
-
손실보상금의 종류와 과세소득의 구분
조세법연구
2015 .08
-
정당보상 구현을 위한 손실보상 제도의 개선방안
법학연구
2011 .05
-
e-비즈니스 IT 프로젝트 관리의 정성적 접근 모형의 개발
한국IT서비스학회지
2002 .01
-
공공기관의 보상 현황과 개선방향
한국경영과학회지
2015 .02
-
공급자 관점에서 정보시스템 개발 프로젝트의 범위관리활동이 프로세스성과와 결과물성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구
한국IT서비스학회지
2009 .01
-
“CISG”상의 금전손해배상에 관한 연구* －제74조를 중심으로－
외법논집
2012 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-595-000860150