지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to explain on the problems of complement distinction in syntax and processing them in Lexicon. This task concerns the identity of the argument, the complement, and the adjunct.
At first, the argument is the semantic conception which can not become sentential element by itself without combining with case marker in a sentence.
At second, The complement is a obligatory element that a head indispensibly requires in a syntactic construction.
At third, the adjunct is a optional element that is different from the complement. It realizes when some informations are related to ground which should be mentioned in detail.
At fourth, the adverbials that some predicates require inevitably are the complement in that construction. These complements combine with the following predicate which require themselves, and then the resulted construction i. e. the complex construction(=CC) should behave as a single unit syntactically.
At fifth, cause this CC is not a single unit, it is difficult to specify the syntactic information of them at the leixcon. Therefore, we have to describe this information by the extended lexicon which can deal with not a single unit as a word or a affix but also this CC temporally.
At first, the argument is the semantic conception which can not become sentential element by itself without combining with case marker in a sentence.
At second, The complement is a obligatory element that a head indispensibly requires in a syntactic construction.
At third, the adjunct is a optional element that is different from the complement. It realizes when some informations are related to ground which should be mentioned in detail.
At fourth, the adverbials that some predicates require inevitably are the complement in that construction. These complements combine with the following predicate which require themselves, and then the resulted construction i. e. the complex construction(=CC) should behave as a single unit syntactically.
At fifth, cause this CC is not a single unit, it is difficult to specify the syntactic information of them at the leixcon. Therefore, we have to describe this information by the extended lexicon which can deal with not a single unit as a word or a affix but also this CC temporally.
목차
1. 서론
2. 논항, 보충어, 부가어의 개념 다시 보기
3. 필수 부사어의 어휘부 처리 문제
4. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (39)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-810-001384139