지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper analyzes how the war bonds issued by Japan following the Sino-Japanese War were absorbed. Once target amounts were set for each region of Japan, Joseon, Taiwan. etc., the Joseon Governor General Office divided the allocated amounts for each Do (province), which, in turn, further distributed the allotments to sub-provinces: Bus (府) and Guns (郡). The Do-specific amounts were generally based on each Do’s income. and the household -specific amounts on household income taxes. War bonds were absorbed in the forms of direct and indirect taxes. Japan attempted to increase the government bond absorption rates by actively taking advantage of the points where income and consumption took place. Given that the war bonds Joseon citizens were forced to purchase had no real value due to the inflation and were not redeemed upon maturity, the bonds were therefore no different from taxes.
Although the war bonds were basically featured as compulsory, they also appealed to the public’s patriotism and speculative spirit. While claiming that purchasing of the bonds was the sacred obligation of the citizens. the colonial office advertised the huge amount of money the winners would get. This, however, contradicts the ideology that Japan used to mobilize resources to wage wars: the nation forced its people to sacrifice their private interests for the good of the country on one side while encouraging them to buy bonds by campaigning on a dream of fortune on the other. This clearly shows the inherent limitations of the war bonds with no economic value.
Although the war bonds were basically featured as compulsory, they also appealed to the public’s patriotism and speculative spirit. While claiming that purchasing of the bonds was the sacred obligation of the citizens. the colonial office advertised the huge amount of money the winners would get. This, however, contradicts the ideology that Japan used to mobilize resources to wage wars: the nation forced its people to sacrifice their private interests for the good of the country on one side while encouraging them to buy bonds by campaigning on a dream of fortune on the other. This clearly shows the inherent limitations of the war bonds with no economic value.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 전시공채의 지역별 할당 실태
3. 조세로서 기능한 전시공채의 소화 양태
4. 전시고채 소화율 제고책에 내재된 모순
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
일제시기 조선은행 개조 논쟁과 그 함의 : 제국의 이상과 식민지 현실의 길항
조명근
한국사학보
2013
.05
1910년대 조선은행의 만주 진출과 ‘해외은행’으로서의 정체성 형성
조명근
아세아연구
2012
.12
동아시아적 근대성에 대한 새로운 모색 : 미야지마 히로시 『나의 한국사 공부』, 너머북스 2013. 『일본의 역사관을 비판한다』, 창비 2013
유재건
창작과비평
2013
.09
조선후기 조선중화주의와 그 해석 문제
계승범
한국사연구
2012
.12
일제 시기 ‘역사의 과학화’ 논쟁과 역사학계 ‘관학아카데미즘’의 문제
김종준
한국사학보
2012
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0