메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
서순복 (조선대학교)
저널정보
한국문화관광연구원 문화정책논총 문화정책논총 제18집
발행연도
2007.2
수록면
69 - 100 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Culture and Arts Promotion Act (CAPA) was established in 1971, fully revised in 1995, and has been revised over 10 times since then. With the advent of the new millennium, the law on the Promotion of Cultural Industry was enacted, thus expanding the role of the country in the promotion of cultural industry. However, in more than a few cases such legislative moves, motivated by changes in the cultural environment, have been performed without sufficient study. In particular, because discussions of basic law like the Constitution and the CAPA have been insufficient, many misconceptions have been repeated with regard to the spher es and definitions of culture and arts. This study analyzed the circumstances and realities of the laws related to culture and arts led by the Culture and Arts Promotion Act (CAPA). Specifically, the study looked into the tasks in the public sector with regard to the goals of the CAPA and the activities for culture and arts promotion, examined the characteristics and system of the CAPA, and analyzed its major contents in terms of comparative law, thus surveying the legislative future of the CAPA in light of the recent trend of the reorganization of culturerelated laws and regulations.
It seems cost-effective in terms of Cost Benefit Analysis of Law to strengthen the CAPA’s character of basic law; rename the CAPA’s title the Culture Promotion Act (CPA) by expanding the concept of culture; define the essence, utility and role of culture in the preamble; expand the concept of culture in the direction of embracing living culture; complement the basic idea and objectives of cultural policy in a way that shows the basic direction of the cultural policies of the culture-related central governmental agencies; establish the provisions for the new needs of cultural policy, such as cultural impact assessment, and on the institutional frameworks for new demands of organization law, such as the Commission for National Cultural Promotion; and revise and update the problems of the existing provisions in the direction of meeting actual conditions.

목차

I. 문제제기 및 연구목적
II. 문화예술의 정의 - 문화정책과 문화법의 관점
III. 문화예술진흥법의 목적과 공공부문에 의한 문화예술의 진흥
IV. 문화예술진흥법의 특성과 내용분석
V. 문화예술진흥관련법령의 비교법적 검토
VI. 문화예술 진흥법을 위한 법체계 개선방향
<참고문헌>
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-505-003510520