지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to identify historical significance of the 1901 Association law, which has received relatively little attention throughout the history of anti-clericalism under the French Third Republic, compared to the 1905 law on the Separation of the Churches and the State. To this end, this paper examines political and social circumstances behind the enactment of the Association law, parliamentary disputes over establishing the law, and then anti-clericalism policies promoted by Radical Republican Party’s Emile Combe administration that strictly applied the law.
The Association law was enacted in 1901 with the intention of controlling and curbing clericalism responsible for endangering the Third Republic with the Dreyfus affair in the final years of the 19th century. The law, spearheaded by Pierre Waldeck-Rousseau’s ‘Republican Defense Cabinet’ dealt with not only allowing citizens to have the freedom of association, but also controlling Congregation, which was wielding strong influence over the society. During the legislation, the conservative right wing and clericalists argued that Congregation also and socialists reputed the idea, saying that being a citizen is basically a prerequisite for a right to association, and therefore Congregation defined as a faith community was not eligible for being a free association.
Radical Republican Party’s Emile Combe government, which took power after having won the general election in 1902, rigidly enforced the Association law. The government closed unauthorized Congregations and their affiliate educational institutions, made it a law to ban all congregationist educational activities, and began in earnest to discuss a law on the separation of religion and politics. Placing a high value on democracy, republicanism and secularity, the Party did not object to the Church itself, but to clericalists posing a treat to democracy and republic by colluding with conservative fore to intervence in political, social realms. The Association law and the Combe government’s anti-clericalism policy served as a basis for establishing the 1905 law on the Separation of the Churches and the State.
The Association law was enacted in 1901 with the intention of controlling and curbing clericalism responsible for endangering the Third Republic with the Dreyfus affair in the final years of the 19th century. The law, spearheaded by Pierre Waldeck-Rousseau’s ‘Republican Defense Cabinet’ dealt with not only allowing citizens to have the freedom of association, but also controlling Congregation, which was wielding strong influence over the society. During the legislation, the conservative right wing and clericalists argued that Congregation also and socialists reputed the idea, saying that being a citizen is basically a prerequisite for a right to association, and therefore Congregation defined as a faith community was not eligible for being a free association.
Radical Republican Party’s Emile Combe government, which took power after having won the general election in 1902, rigidly enforced the Association law. The government closed unauthorized Congregations and their affiliate educational institutions, made it a law to ban all congregationist educational activities, and began in earnest to discuss a law on the separation of religion and politics. Placing a high value on democracy, republicanism and secularity, the Party did not object to the Church itself, but to clericalists posing a treat to democracy and republic by colluding with conservative fore to intervence in political, social realms. The Association law and the Combe government’s anti-clericalism policy served as a basis for establishing the 1905 law on the Separation of the Churches and the State.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 드레퓌스 사건과 반교권주의
Ⅲ. 1901년 결사법 제정 논쟁
Ⅳ. 콩브 정부의 반교권주의 정책
Ⅴ. 나오며
〈Resume〉
〈Summary〉
참고문헌 (64)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Jean-Pierre Chantin / 2010 / Le régime concordataire français: la collaboration des Eglises et de l’État 1802-1905 / Beauchesne
2. [단행본] - Bernard Ardura / 2001 / Le concordat entre Pie VII et Bonaparte, 15 juillet 1801 / Cerf
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 민유기 / 1998 / 프랑스 교육동맹 운동의 정치적 사회적 성격 1868-1889 / 史叢 48 : 244 ~ 245
4. [단행본] - Jean-Marie Mayeur / 2005 / La Séparation de l’Église et de l’État / Éditions de l’Atelier
5. [단행본] - Jean Baubérot / 2004 / Laïcité 1905-2005, entre passion et raison / Seuil
2. [단행본] - Bernard Ardura / 2001 / Le concordat entre Pie VII et Bonaparte, 15 juillet 1801 / Cerf
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 민유기 / 1998 / 프랑스 교육동맹 운동의 정치적 사회적 성격 1868-1889 / 史叢 48 : 244 ~ 245
4. [단행본] - Jean-Marie Mayeur / 2005 / La Séparation de l’Église et de l’État / Éditions de l’Atelier
5. [단행본] - Jean Baubérot / 2004 / Laïcité 1905-2005, entre passion et raison / Seuil
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
조레스의 드레퓌스사건 개입의 이유와 의미, 1898년 1월~1899년 6월
노서경
프랑스사 연구
1999
.06
악랄한 교권 탄압으로 돌아가신 이순덕 선생님
이주영
,
권오원
,
김숙진
외 6명
우리교육
2016
.06
야스쿠니의 신화 : 현대일본의 종교와 정치
박규태
종교연구
2008
.03
온라인 커뮤니티의 사회적 자본과 제도 : 디시인사이드 바람의 화원/바람의 나라 갤러리를 중심으로
이헌아
,
류석진
정보사회와 미디어
2013
.12
교사와 학생 모두를 존중하는 문화 : 캐나다의 교권 보호와 교원 평가
송경은
우리교육
2013
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-926-003214768