메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이성례 (한국미술연구소)
저널정보
한국미술연구소 미술사논단 美術史論壇 第35號
발행연도
2012.12
수록면
209 - 237 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Rha Hyeseok, who was our country’s first woman oil painter, gave an exhibition of her pictures for the first time in Seoul, and worked diligently on the stage of the Joseon Art Exhibition. During the period when some senior painters such as Go Heedong and Kim Kwanho left the circle of painters in the Western style, Rha Hyeseok did not lose self-awareness as a pioneer, and left numerous statements related to art in parallel with critical works.
Starting from the publishing of “Paintings and Joseon Women” in Dong-A Ilbo in February 1921, she left a distinct mark on early modern art criticism, in 1924 writing “The sundry Observations of Gyeongseong: I Have a Look One Year after Seeing the Joseon Art Exhibition,” which is the first review of an exhibition written by a critic using her real name and, in 1933, “The Impression of the Joseon Art Exhibition” serially, which is the first criticism that comprehensively criticized the Joseon Art Exhibition. Besides art criticism, she wrote articles with enlightened characteristics that provided the concept and idea of art to the public, or published essays giving personal insight into what she had experienced and felt in the creative process. Moreover, she wrote in detail about the art world and art trends she experienced in the West in her travels, and recounted her travels around the world and how that became a turning point in her life.
By today’s standards, the art criticism Rha Hyeseok wrote can be evaluated as only opinions that describe her impressive and subjective views, rather than objective observations based on academic basics such as aesthetics, science of the arts, and art history. She also confessed her limitations as a critic, describing herself as an outsider. However, there is no denying her achievements, in that she concretely pointed out the strengths and weaknesses of painters’ works, provided formative logic for the public, and edified the creation of art by voicing criticism about the mechanism of the contemporary art world, and connected art and the public in the early period of the field of art criticism.
Her form of criticism, which combined creation and theory, shows a meaning that maintains literary calligraphic painters’ tradition with an embrace of poetry, calligraphy, and painting, and the aspect of an elite artist that directly defends her creative activities. That is why we must pay attention to Rha Hyeseok, who lived her life full of twists and turns, left not a few art reviews, and contributed to the realization of a new painting sprit during a transitional period.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 근대기 미술비평의 흐름과 나혜석
Ⅲ. 나혜석이 남긴 미술 관련 평설
Ⅳ. 나오며
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-650-000449473