인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
South Korea practically has become an abolitionist since it has not excuted the Death Penalty for over 15 years. However, the Constitutional Court of Korea ruled in 2010 that the Death Penalty system does not violate Article 10 and 37 section 2 of constitution.
Therefore, this thesis reviewed most current case 2010. 2. 25 2008 Hun-Ka 23 judgement with critical perspective for the death penalty and its domestic and international trend and results are followed as below.
As human dignity must be based on the right to life as it is ensured by article 10 of the constitution, the death penalty is said to be contradicting directly with human dignity and its right to life because the right to life can be recognized as the fundamental ensured by the constitution as foundation to human existence.
Within constitutional order where right to life is protected, concept of "life valueless to protect" and "life valueless to exist" must not be placed as a driving force in policy making. The death penalty recognizes criminal as a means to prevent recurrence of crime and is an inhuman system not providing moral freedom to regret or improver, by so it is violating the article 10 of constitution I think.
In addition, the death penalty is a punishment as only retribution and isolating criminals from society is effective as life sentence, and in case of sentencing life to a nefarious criminal, it is hard to see right justice balance between infringement in legal right of criminal by the punishment and degree of infringement in legal right by crime with responsibility of criminal.
Therefore, I believe life sentence can achieve means of punishment and think creating biggest damage as deprivation of human life under the name of law and justice is violating principle of excessive restriction.
In Korea, since abolishment of death penalty, growth of violent crime has not been proved objectively and the trial is as it is carried out by human, it is clear that we can not exclude possibility of misjudgement. As the Constitutional Court of Korea has expressed, if misjudgement is considered to be a fatal limitation of judicial trial, because of rather this limitation, the punishment depriving most fundamental right to life of humanity that is impossible to recover must be diminished.
Therefore, this thesis reviewed most current case 2010. 2. 25 2008 Hun-Ka 23 judgement with critical perspective for the death penalty and its domestic and international trend and results are followed as below.
As human dignity must be based on the right to life as it is ensured by article 10 of the constitution, the death penalty is said to be contradicting directly with human dignity and its right to life because the right to life can be recognized as the fundamental ensured by the constitution as foundation to human existence.
Within constitutional order where right to life is protected, concept of "life valueless to protect" and "life valueless to exist" must not be placed as a driving force in policy making. The death penalty recognizes criminal as a means to prevent recurrence of crime and is an inhuman system not providing moral freedom to regret or improver, by so it is violating the article 10 of constitution I think.
In addition, the death penalty is a punishment as only retribution and isolating criminals from society is effective as life sentence, and in case of sentencing life to a nefarious criminal, it is hard to see right justice balance between infringement in legal right of criminal by the punishment and degree of infringement in legal right by crime with responsibility of criminal.
Therefore, I believe life sentence can achieve means of punishment and think creating biggest damage as deprivation of human life under the name of law and justice is violating principle of excessive restriction.
In Korea, since abolishment of death penalty, growth of violent crime has not been proved objectively and the trial is as it is carried out by human, it is clear that we can not exclude possibility of misjudgement. As the Constitutional Court of Korea has expressed, if misjudgement is considered to be a fatal limitation of judicial trial, because of rather this limitation, the punishment depriving most fundamental right to life of humanity that is impossible to recover must be diminished.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-360-000214451
