지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper argues that the American perception of Asia has been fundamentally a product of both Orientalism, in which Asia is seen as “the Other” of Europe, and American commercial interest in Asia. America has formulated its image and perception of Asia due mainly to its commercial interest in Asia, which the founding fathers of America as early as the late 18th century widely shared with one another as a key for the newly-born country. In the nineteenth century, as America reached the Pacific and made it its western border, many American leaders believed that the future of the country would be determined by its successful expansion toward Asia across the Pacific, and since then, America has developed its ‘dual national identities’ as both a Pacific and Atlantic Power, which in turn explains why America has increasingly maintained its deep interest in Asia and the Pacific.
American Area Studies, which begun with the Cold War with the financial supports from the federal governmen for its Cold War policies and various academic foundations, elevated American images and perceptions of Asia to the status of sort of ‘facts’ about Asia through its scientific, interdisciplinary researches, while inheriting and materializing the previous American perceptions of Asia. The theoretical backbone of American Area Studies was the modernization theory that sees Asia as traditional, backward, and vulnerable to communism. In short, the American perception of Asia, produced by the Area Studies during the Cold War, was a product of the combination of Orientalism, racism, and culturalism, as well as American commercial, political, religious interests that have stemmed from the American ‘dual national identities’ as both a Pacific and Atlantic Power.
American Area Studies, which begun with the Cold War with the financial supports from the federal governmen for its Cold War policies and various academic foundations, elevated American images and perceptions of Asia to the status of sort of ‘facts’ about Asia through its scientific, interdisciplinary researches, while inheriting and materializing the previous American perceptions of Asia. The theoretical backbone of American Area Studies was the modernization theory that sees Asia as traditional, backward, and vulnerable to communism. In short, the American perception of Asia, produced by the Area Studies during the Cold War, was a product of the combination of Orientalism, racism, and culturalism, as well as American commercial, political, religious interests that have stemmed from the American ‘dual national identities’ as both a Pacific and Atlantic Power.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 미국의 아시아 인식: 역사적 기원
Ⅲ. 냉전, 지역연구, ‘적’과 ‘우방’
Ⅳ. 지역연구의 이론과 냉전시기 미국의 아시아 인식
Ⅴ. 맺음말을 대신하여
참고문헌
[ABSTRACT]
참고문헌 (55)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김경일 / 1996 / 전후 미국에서 지역연구의 성립과 발전 / 지역연구 5 (3)
2. [단행본] - 김태승 / 2000 / 중국근대사 인식의 계보와 유산-탈근대적 중국사 인식의 전망을 위한 문제 제기 in 20세기 역사학, 21세기 역사학 / 역사비평사
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 허은 / 2003 / 1950년대 ‘주한 미공보원'(USIS)의 역할과 문화전파 지향 / 韓國史學報 15 : 8 ~ 262
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 황동연 / 1999 / 21세기 전야 미국 지역연구(Area Studies)의 운명: 전지구화와 그에 따른 지역연구의 방향에 대한 미국학계의 비판적 논의 / 동아시아역사연구 6
5. [기타자료] - 이정식 교수 인터뷰 / 2007 / 이정식 교수 인터뷰 / 신동아 : 576 ~
2. [단행본] - 김태승 / 2000 / 중국근대사 인식의 계보와 유산-탈근대적 중국사 인식의 전망을 위한 문제 제기 in 20세기 역사학, 21세기 역사학 / 역사비평사
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 허은 / 2003 / 1950년대 ‘주한 미공보원'(USIS)의 역할과 문화전파 지향 / 韓國史學報 15 : 8 ~ 262
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 황동연 / 1999 / 21세기 전야 미국 지역연구(Area Studies)의 운명: 전지구화와 그에 따른 지역연구의 방향에 대한 미국학계의 비판적 논의 / 동아시아역사연구 6
5. [기타자료] - 이정식 교수 인터뷰 / 2007 / 이정식 교수 인터뷰 / 신동아 : 576 ~
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-002363295