지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The "civilian kidnapping(abduction) during wartime" was a hot issue that was debated for a long time, not only when the cease-fire was being negotiated between South and North Koreas, but also today, 60 years later after the war was finally discontinued. The issue of people who were taken to the north against their own will during the war was discussed in the POW(Prisoner of War) negotiations, but the U.N. forces(and South Korea), which argued the said "abduction," could not reach an agreement with North Korea as it offered a counter-argument that people who were moving away from the crossfire were forcibly kidnapped(to the South). Both sides finally agreed on a clause which dictated that people who lost their homes("Displaced Citizens") would be returned. But in reality, exchanges of people("repatriation") according to that dictation were never arranged.
Examined in this article, are the issues that were discussed in the POW discussion at the Cease-fire negotiation. The opinions of both sides will be compared, to determine how they led to the "Displaced citizens" clause of 59 in the Cease-fire treaty document. South Korea argued that all moving incidents to the North during wartime was abduction, and demanded the abducted people be considered as POWs and returned to the South at once. On the other hand, North Korea argued there were no abductees but only people who voluntarily moved to the South. North Korea even rebutted South Korea"s claim by saying that the U.N. forces threatened the North Korean residences and took them to the South around the time of January 4th pullback.
The U.N. forces were not able to dismiss South Korea"s request, but did not want the cease-fire negotiations to drag over this matter which could not be proved easily either way. So, the U.N. forces agreed to return displaced(alienated) civilians, and North Korea agreed to cooperate with that to a certain extent, and thus the 59th clause was born. But after the cease-fire, such "people exchange" never succeeded, and the arguments and conflicts continued between South and North.
Examined in this article, are the issues that were discussed in the POW discussion at the Cease-fire negotiation. The opinions of both sides will be compared, to determine how they led to the "Displaced citizens" clause of 59 in the Cease-fire treaty document. South Korea argued that all moving incidents to the North during wartime was abduction, and demanded the abducted people be considered as POWs and returned to the South at once. On the other hand, North Korea argued there were no abductees but only people who voluntarily moved to the South. North Korea even rebutted South Korea"s claim by saying that the U.N. forces threatened the North Korean residences and took them to the South around the time of January 4th pullback.
The U.N. forces were not able to dismiss South Korea"s request, but did not want the cease-fire negotiations to drag over this matter which could not be proved easily either way. So, the U.N. forces agreed to return displaced(alienated) civilians, and North Korea agreed to cooperate with that to a certain extent, and thus the 59th clause was born. But after the cease-fire, such "people exchange" never succeeded, and the arguments and conflicts continued between South and North.
목차
머리말
1. 휴전회담시 민간인 송환을 위한 유엔군(남한)측 제안과 요구
2. 휴전회담시 월남 피난민 문제에 대한 공산군(북한)측 제안과 요구
3. 타협의 산물, 실향사민 조항으로의 귀결
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 김귀옥 / 2004 / 이산가족, ‘반공전사’도 ‘빨갱이’도 아닌… / 역사비평사
2. [단행본] - 양영조 / 2007 / 한국전쟁과 동북아 국가 정책 / 선인
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강성현 / 2009 / 한국전쟁기 유엔군의 피난민 인식과 정책 / 사림 (33) : 77 ~ 119
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김명호 / 2006 / 6？25전쟁 납북자의 납북동기 분석에 관한 실증적 연구 / 정책분석평가학회보 16 (3) : 113 ~ 138
6. [학술대회논문] - 김미영 / 2010 / 휴전협정 체제에서의 납북 민간인 송환실패의 원인과 과정 / 납북자문제의 기원·확산·해결 , 국제학술대회 발표문
2. [단행본] - 양영조 / 2007 / 한국전쟁과 동북아 국가 정책 / 선인
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강성현 / 2009 / 한국전쟁기 유엔군의 피난민 인식과 정책 / 사림 (33) : 77 ~ 119
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김명호 / 2006 / 6？25전쟁 납북자의 납북동기 분석에 관한 실증적 연구 / 정책분석평가학회보 16 (3) : 113 ~ 138
6. [학술대회논문] - 김미영 / 2010 / 휴전협정 체제에서의 납북 민간인 송환실패의 원인과 과정 / 납북자문제의 기원·확산·해결 , 국제학술대회 발표문
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-003124361