지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article compares leadership style of King Sejong(1418-1450) and King Sejo(1455-1468) in the view of deliberative politics. Deliberative politics was designed Confucian intellectuals who believed the appropriate process will help minimize the anxiety and work out a reasonable alternative.
So geongguk-daejon, the statecraft law of Joseon dynasty, guarantees the privilege of exception from liability for the Eon Gwan, the officials who were authorized to criticize the King’s words and deeds. Joseon dynasty put emphasis on the fair and cautious process of policy decision through periodical court conferences in which critical debates on the political agenda were guaranteed, all these were the results of systemizing the opinion politics.
Deliberative politics, however, may be an factor declining efficacy of decision making process in wartime. As Tocqueville put it, with special reference to democracy, conduct of war demand scarcely any of those qualities which are peculiar to deliberative politics.
I investigated two kings’ decision-making cases of "Pajeo-gang" expeditions. King Sejong, in 1433, sent the expedition army against Jurchen people living in "Pajeo-gang" for retaliation. King Sejo also in 1460, sent the expedition army. King Sejo, as a result, performed better in military operations. I concludes cautiously that open public discussion could not be the effective means.
So geongguk-daejon, the statecraft law of Joseon dynasty, guarantees the privilege of exception from liability for the Eon Gwan, the officials who were authorized to criticize the King’s words and deeds. Joseon dynasty put emphasis on the fair and cautious process of policy decision through periodical court conferences in which critical debates on the political agenda were guaranteed, all these were the results of systemizing the opinion politics.
Deliberative politics, however, may be an factor declining efficacy of decision making process in wartime. As Tocqueville put it, with special reference to democracy, conduct of war demand scarcely any of those qualities which are peculiar to deliberative politics.
I investigated two kings’ decision-making cases of "Pajeo-gang" expeditions. King Sejong, in 1433, sent the expedition army against Jurchen people living in "Pajeo-gang" for retaliation. King Sejo also in 1460, sent the expedition army. King Sejo, as a result, performed better in military operations. I concludes cautiously that open public discussion could not be the effective means.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 세조시대의 공론정치 양태와 특징
Ⅲ. 세종과 세조 정부의 의사결정 사례
Ⅳ. 세조정부의 여진정벌 성공요인과 그 함의
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-003292731