지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It was thought that from the early Church there existed the trinitarian faith in the vague form, and the monarchianism could be regarded as some variation of the Judaism. However, as it has been described above, the Modalistic terms formulated by Melito was no speciality. He worked as the bishop of Sardes and left many writings and was praised as ‘star of Asia’ by Eusebius. If his modalistic expressions were regarded as different from the catholic faith of then, he must not have been praised. The bishops of Rome, Zephyrin and Callistus I, could not have supported the heretical faith. On the contrary, Hippolytus was accused of the ditheist who differentiated the father and the Son. Tertullian of Carthago complained that the Modalism was diffused among many Christians. The Modalism survived till the second half of the third century.
Melito and Noetus found Jesus Christ the one God and didn’t distinguish him as the second God from God the Father. They laid the accent on the one God in order to oppose the docetism of Marcion and Gnosticism. They stressed the continuity of the Heilgeschichte, the oneness of God, the incarnation of the God himself, his true humanity, his true passion and his true death. Therefore they identified the creator God and the crucified on the Cross. They maintained the paradoxes as follows: the appearance of the invisible God, the incarnation of the unoriginate God, the passion of the unpassionable God, the death of the immortal God. Hippolytus accused they plagiarized Heraclitus.
The modalism of the second century gave rise to the trinitarian debate. They maintained Jesus Christ was God and at the same time a human being and the true God became human being. This theory had its legitimacy by opposing the docetism of the gnostics and the ditheism of Marcion. Therefore the early modalism came into being from the confrontation with the gnosticism.
Melito and Noetus found Jesus Christ the one God and didn’t distinguish him as the second God from God the Father. They laid the accent on the one God in order to oppose the docetism of Marcion and Gnosticism. They stressed the continuity of the Heilgeschichte, the oneness of God, the incarnation of the God himself, his true humanity, his true passion and his true death. Therefore they identified the creator God and the crucified on the Cross. They maintained the paradoxes as follows: the appearance of the invisible God, the incarnation of the unoriginate God, the passion of the unpassionable God, the death of the immortal God. Hippolytus accused they plagiarized Heraclitus.
The modalism of the second century gave rise to the trinitarian debate. They maintained Jesus Christ was God and at the same time a human being and the true God became human being. This theory had its legitimacy by opposing the docetism of the gnostics and the ditheism of Marcion. Therefore the early modalism came into being from the confrontation with the gnosticism.
목차
I. 연구 상황 및 문제 제기
Ⅱ. 양태론의 정의
Ⅲ. 노에투스의 양태론
Ⅳ. 멜리토
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (29)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Andresen, Carl / 1961 / Zur Entstehung und Geschichte des trinitarischen Personbegriffes / Zeitschrift des Neutestamentlichen Wissenschaft 62 : 1 ~ 39
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bienert, Wolfgang C. / 1979 / Das vornicänische ὁμοούσιος als Ausdruck der Rechtgläubigkeit / Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte 90 : 151 ~ 175
3. [단행본] - Bousset, Wilhelm / 1965 / Kyrios Christos / Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Cantalamessa, R. / 1963 / Meliton de Sardes. Une christologie antignostique du IIe siecle / Revue des Sciences Religieuses 37 : 1 ~ 26
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - DelCogliano, Mark / 2012 / The Interpretation of John 10:30 in the third Century: Anti- monarchian Polemics and the Rise of Grammatical Reading Techniques / Journal of Theological Interpretation 6 : 117 ~ 138
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bienert, Wolfgang C. / 1979 / Das vornicänische ὁμοούσιος als Ausdruck der Rechtgläubigkeit / Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte 90 : 151 ~ 175
3. [단행본] - Bousset, Wilhelm / 1965 / Kyrios Christos / Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Cantalamessa, R. / 1963 / Meliton de Sardes. Une christologie antignostique du IIe siecle / Revue des Sciences Religieuses 37 : 1 ~ 26
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - DelCogliano, Mark / 2012 / The Interpretation of John 10:30 in the third Century: Anti- monarchian Polemics and the Rise of Grammatical Reading Techniques / Journal of Theological Interpretation 6 : 117 ~ 138
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-200-002962499