메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
한영림 (경북대학교)
저널정보
한국셰익스피어학회 Shakespeare Review Shakespeare Review Vol.49 No.3
발행연도
2013.9
수록면
501 - 520 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Roland Emmerich’s Anonymous(2011) questions whether Shakespeare wrote the works attributed to him, and proposes Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford as the real author. Emmerich’s film is in line with the Oxfordian theory that was first advanced by J. Thomas Looney in his “Shakespeare” Identified in Edward de Vere, the Seventeenth Earl of Oxford” in 1920. It is representative of the current tendency in which the question of Shakespeare authorship has been to the fore. Emmerich characterizes his film as an historical thriller whose story tells how Shakespeare came not to be the author of his plays in conjunction with who would succeed Queen Elizabeth and what was the cause of the Essex Rebellion.
This paper discusses this historical thriller in terms of how Shakespeare became an author of those plays he did not write, and why the Earl of Oxford gave up on his legitimate claim to be an author. The discussion observes that it deconstructs the authenticity of Shakespeare authorship by a means of a ‘play within a film’ structure, and that this structure places an emphasis on the relationship between Ben Jonson and the publication of the First Folio in 1623, and on the true intention of Jonson’s words “Soule of the Age.” Then this paper concludes that an account of the authorship question displayed in Anonymous should be seen as one Shakespearean theory among others which have reinforced a legacy of his authority.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (11)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0