지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015.3
- 수록면
- 95 - 113 (19page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Samuel Taylor Coleridge borrowed ideas from his eighteenth-century predecessors, modified them into his theories such as ‘practical criticism’ and ‘mental philosophy’, introduced new terms such as ‘modern’, ‘romantic’ and ‘psychological’, then changed the course of criticism by demonstrating Shakespeare as an archetype of the creative imagination and by treating his plays as wholes rather than parts. Coleridge’s criticism of Shakespeare was characteristic of his philosophic depths and profound imagination. He identified Shakespeare’s creative practice with the process of shaping his identity.
Coleridge’s notion of Shakespeare was connected to the study of the workings of Hamlet’s mind and his inward poetic world. He coined the term ‘psychological Method’ to express a profoundly philosophic mind, and formulated its principles by turning to Hamlet for an example of the methodically cultivated mind: Hamlet’s recollection is mediated by reflection, and his mental activity involved in developing a general truth from his experience. This method formed the ground for the Coleridgean smack of Hamlet as a man of exceptional intelligence and introspective genius.
Coleridge’s image of Hamlet lent himself to be an object of the debate over his critical practice of noting down: his tendency towards digression, inconsistent pattern of thought, and insufficiency in making connections between various concepts. His contemporary critics were censorious of his incapacity to constitute an explanatory discourse. The Coleridge-Hamlet image, however, initiated the phenomenon ‘the Hamlet effect’, that is, the reading of him as a personal identification with his character. It has secured the most influential position in the history of the criticism of Hamlet.
Coleridge’s notion of Shakespeare was connected to the study of the workings of Hamlet’s mind and his inward poetic world. He coined the term ‘psychological Method’ to express a profoundly philosophic mind, and formulated its principles by turning to Hamlet for an example of the methodically cultivated mind: Hamlet’s recollection is mediated by reflection, and his mental activity involved in developing a general truth from his experience. This method formed the ground for the Coleridgean smack of Hamlet as a man of exceptional intelligence and introspective genius.
Coleridge’s image of Hamlet lent himself to be an object of the debate over his critical practice of noting down: his tendency towards digression, inconsistent pattern of thought, and insufficiency in making connections between various concepts. His contemporary critics were censorious of his incapacity to constitute an explanatory discourse. The Coleridge-Hamlet image, however, initiated the phenomenon ‘the Hamlet effect’, that is, the reading of him as a personal identification with his character. It has secured the most influential position in the history of the criticism of Hamlet.
목차
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Bate, Jonathan / 1989 / Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination / Clarendon P
2. [단행본] - Coleridge, Samuel Taylor / 1859 / A Dissertation of the Science of Method; or the Laws and Regular Principles of Education / Charles Griffin and Company
3. [단행본] - Coleridge, Samuel Taylor / 1983 / Biographia Literaria, 2 vols / Routledge & Kegan Paul/Princeton UP
4. [단행본] - Coleridge, Samuel Taylor / 1987 / Lectures 1808-1819 on Literature, 2 vols / Routledge & Kegan Paul/Princeton UP
5. [단행본] - Coleridge, Samuel Taylor / 1990 / Table Talk, 2 vols / Routledge & Kegan Paul/Princeton UP
2. [단행본] - Coleridge, Samuel Taylor / 1859 / A Dissertation of the Science of Method; or the Laws and Regular Principles of Education / Charles Griffin and Company
3. [단행본] - Coleridge, Samuel Taylor / 1983 / Biographia Literaria, 2 vols / Routledge & Kegan Paul/Princeton UP
4. [단행본] - Coleridge, Samuel Taylor / 1987 / Lectures 1808-1819 on Literature, 2 vols / Routledge & Kegan Paul/Princeton UP
5. [단행본] - Coleridge, Samuel Taylor / 1990 / Table Talk, 2 vols / Routledge & Kegan Paul/Princeton UP
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
햄릿에서 셰익스피어의 관객 통제
고전 르네상스 영문학
2015 .01
-
호두 껍데기, 자궁, 그리고 햄릿의 감옥?<햄릿>과 매큐언의 <호두 껍데기>
영어영문학21
2021 .12
-
셰익스피어의 『햄릿』과 테니슨의 『모드』의 비교연구: 생각의 문제
영어영문학
2016 .02
-
『햄릿』의 각색과 영화적 변용
국제언어문학
2017 .04
-
햄릿과 그의 세계 : 하이데거의 『존재와 시간』을 통한 실존론적 존재론 고찰
Shakespeare Review
2015 .03
-
『햄릿』에서 <햄릿>으로 : 디지털 콘텐츠로 읽는 햄릿의 재해석 작업 비교 연구
동서비교문학저널
2016 .03
-
햄릿의 절대 주체로서의 “나”
영어영문학연구
2019 .01
-
양정웅과 스티븐 그린블랏: 애도극으로 『햄릿』 읽기
고전 르네상스 영문학
2016 .12
-
『햄릿』영화들과 정동
새한영어영문학
2016 .02
-
Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s Literary Criticism: Diagnosing and Solving Problems in the Literary Landscape
동서비교문학저널
2024 .09
-
Hamlet's (Un)manly Grief: the Cult of the Past in the Age of Theatrical Power
영미문화
2017 .01
-
색채의 상징성과 플롯 변형: <야연>(The Banquet)과 『햄릿』(Hamlet)의 비교분석
Shakespeare Review
2024 .06
-
Hamlet and Turnus Compared: Their Views of Death
고전 르네상스 영문학
2017 .06
-
셰익스피어, 오늘을 이야기하다: 할리우드에서 부활한 『햄릿』
현대영어영문학
2018 .01
-
발터 벤야민, 칼 슈미트, 『햄릿』―‘주권’사상을 중심으로
현대영어영문학
2015 .01
-
합리적 개인주의 : 『줄리어스 시저』와 『햄릿』에 나타난 주체 형성하기
동서비교문학저널
2018 .09
-
An Existentialist Revision of Shakespeare’s Skepticism in Hamlet, the Walking Man
Shakespeare Review
2024 .06
-
A Synthesis of Lacanian Psychoanalysis and New Historicism in Explicating Hamlet’s Third Soliloquy
현대정신분석
2017 .08
-
The Birth of Political Shakespeare: Ki Kukseo’s Hamlet Productions in the 1980s
영어영문학21
2017 .01
-
The Legality of Hamlet’s Modern Revenge
Shakespeare Review
2021 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-840-001407779