지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.11
- 수록면
- 1,407 - 1,412 (6page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (5)
2013
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
All vehicle should ensure that roadworthiness to service, and Each country operates PTI and Roadside inspection(part of safety) for apposite to the case. In the case of Korea, however, operates PTI only. PTI is operated most countries, and expanded operation Roadside inspection since stabilization of PTI. PTI is likely to be costly to operate because it needs a lot of inspection facility and equipment. For the reason, each country is shared the cost through government-operated or privatization.
Developing countries, introducing a vehicle inspection system, have not enough budget and developed network system. So they demand a inspection privatization and prevention weakness inspection. Therefore, they priority should be to establish minimum standard of inspection facilities and equipments that institutional and operational aspect is based on their country feature.
The CITA theorizes minimum standard about inspection facilities and equipments but it does not include prevention weakness inspection. So, I"d like to suggest that Korea"s standard operates privatization system for inspection facilities and equipments of Developing countries; supplement standard of prevention weakness inspection.
Especially, in recent years, many countries like Philippines, Indonesia, Mongolia, Myanmar, etc. has been an increasing interest in Korea"s vehicle inspection standard and inspection training course. Because of this, we support to the Developing countries for PTI that the establishment of national policies and training course.
Developing countries, introducing a vehicle inspection system, have not enough budget and developed network system. So they demand a inspection privatization and prevention weakness inspection. Therefore, they priority should be to establish minimum standard of inspection facilities and equipments that institutional and operational aspect is based on their country feature.
The CITA theorizes minimum standard about inspection facilities and equipments but it does not include prevention weakness inspection. So, I"d like to suggest that Korea"s standard operates privatization system for inspection facilities and equipments of Developing countries; supplement standard of prevention weakness inspection.
Especially, in recent years, many countries like Philippines, Indonesia, Mongolia, Myanmar, etc. has been an increasing interest in Korea"s vehicle inspection standard and inspection training course. Because of this, we support to the Developing countries for PTI that the establishment of national policies and training course.
목차
Abstract
1. 서론
2. 본론
3. 결론
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-550-003464773