메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이영철 (전주대학교)
저널정보
한국동서비교문학학회 동서비교문학저널 동서비교문학저널 제29호
발행연도
2013.12
수록면
265 - 290 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay aims to study the literary continuity of the Harlem Renaissance and Chicago Renaissance. In “Blueprint for Negro Writing,” a special issue of New Challenge magazine, Richard Wright declares the beginnings of a new black literary movement called the Chicago Renaissance In the essay, Wright insists that the Chicago Renaissance writers challenge black writers to fuse Marxist principles with black vernacular expression, but warns against creating a ‘simple literary realism’ that depicts black life as ‘devoid of wider social connotations or the revolutionary significance of black nationalist tendencies.’ His declaration means that the Chicago Renaissance writers should put their focus on the black masses more radically than their elder did. However, it does not say that the Chicago Renaissance writers should reject a legacy of the Harlem Renaissance. The Chicago Renaissance shares the important features of the Harlem Renaissance. Both renaissance writers emphasize heavily the racial themes, and elaborate upon the popular elements of the black folk. In Native Son, Wright’s critical perspective on whites’ racial oppression is the same as McKay’s and Hughes’s critical perspectives in Banzo, “Poor Little Black Boy” and “Slave on the Block.” And Chicago is also not the earliest nexus of Marxist literary influence. African American Marxist tradition originates in the Harlem Renaissance. Wright does not recognize the cultural and political activism of Harlem Renaissance writers such as McKay and Hughes. The Harlem Renaissance elders begin to cultivate an African Marxist cosmopolitanism that merges black aesthetic and cultural traditions with the Marxist perspective of proletarian art. Considering these facts, Wright’s declaration reflects African Americans’ reality of segregated life, poverty, and racism aggravated by the Great Depression of the 1930s, rather than the Harlem Renaissance writers’ aesthetic and cultural traditions.

목차

I. 들어가기
II. 할렘 르네상스의 유산
III. 백인사회의 유희적 경멸과 동정의 시선에 대한 거부
IV. 맺음말
인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-800-001062950