지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Both Kim Suyoung and Beidao worked actively as the poets of the people and also modernism during the 1960’s to 80’s. And they had some things in common as both of them were born before or after the national independence, belonged to the class of intellects, and
were representative poets of the people and modernism symbolizing the 1960’s to 1970’s. Not abandoning their aspects as modernists, they properly utilized metaphor, symbol, the alteration of view, or montage technique and destroyed the order of time and space to realize poems of participation in their own ways differentiated from those used by other poets to write their poems of the people. Moreover, their poems are not confined in the trend of ‘modernism’, but still show the aspects connected with reality by accepting conventional modernism creatively as well as critically.
These poets who were the subjects of resistance during the 1960 to 80’s in Korea and China separately had to adopt some other way differentiated from the former. For instance, Korean poets of the people including Kim Suyoung changed from individual-oriented discourse to people-oriented discourse while Chinese resistant poets like Beidao converted from ‘the people’-oriented socialistic community discourse to individual-oriented discourse against the former. Both of them did open the first door to resistance by forming the subject in a different way from what their own national system adopted.
were representative poets of the people and modernism symbolizing the 1960’s to 1970’s. Not abandoning their aspects as modernists, they properly utilized metaphor, symbol, the alteration of view, or montage technique and destroyed the order of time and space to realize poems of participation in their own ways differentiated from those used by other poets to write their poems of the people. Moreover, their poems are not confined in the trend of ‘modernism’, but still show the aspects connected with reality by accepting conventional modernism creatively as well as critically.
These poets who were the subjects of resistance during the 1960 to 80’s in Korea and China separately had to adopt some other way differentiated from the former. For instance, Korean poets of the people including Kim Suyoung changed from individual-oriented discourse to people-oriented discourse while Chinese resistant poets like Beidao converted from ‘the people’-oriented socialistic community discourse to individual-oriented discourse against the former. Both of them did open the first door to resistance by forming the subject in a different way from what their own national system adopted.
목차
1. 서론
2. 저항담론의 방식-주체의 대응양상 비교
3. 저항의 일상성에 대한 비교
4. 결론
참고문헌
논문초록
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-900-001042548