지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This Paper is critical reflection on formation of Western Modernity and Hegel s judgement about asian world. Hegel was one of the thinkers who know the importance of modernity. He defined the modernity as “new era” “new era” is builded on values of modernity. It means for Hegel freedom of humankind. He interpreted history as history of freedom. In his Interpretation of history “oriental world” was disparaged as a world that despotism rules. Chinese world is the example. Stagnation rules history of Chinese World because chinese political system has never been changed. In Hegel’s judgement countries in asia like China are not able to make better themselves. Hegel predicted that China had destiny to be conquered by western World, that is modern World.
Hegel’s interpretation of history and his judgement on Asian world influenced on many western modern philosophers and thinkers like K. Marx and Max Weber who studied Asian World, and on formation of Eurocentrism that is based on modernity.
Lately modernity and it’s values face a lot of challengers, particularly in relation to Eurocentrism. This paper criticized Eurocentrism that is based on western modernity and argued that western modernity is not the universal purpose that all humankind should follow. Western Modernity is also a Product of civilization exchange between East and West, For example Chinese civilization impacted so many european thinkers like Voltaire, C. Wolf, F, Quesnay in the Enlightenment and influenced the beginning of western modernity. From this historical perspective we newly think modernity and it’s values.
Hegel’s interpretation of history and his judgement on Asian world influenced on many western modern philosophers and thinkers like K. Marx and Max Weber who studied Asian World, and on formation of Eurocentrism that is based on modernity.
Lately modernity and it’s values face a lot of challengers, particularly in relation to Eurocentrism. This paper criticized Eurocentrism that is based on western modernity and argued that western modernity is not the universal purpose that all humankind should follow. Western Modernity is also a Product of civilization exchange between East and West, For example Chinese civilization impacted so many european thinkers like Voltaire, C. Wolf, F, Quesnay in the Enlightenment and influenced the beginning of western modernity. From this historical perspective we newly think modernity and it’s values.
목차
문제제기
1. 초기 계몽주의 시대에 중국이 유럽에 끼친 영향
2. 헤겔의 근대 이해와 부정적 동양세계론
3. 헤겔의 근대적 역사관의 문제점
4. 중국의 근대성 수용과 담론에 대한 비판적 회고
5. 아시아적 근대성 담론의 등장
6. 맺는 말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (33)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
中國에 市民社會가 형성되었나? : 역사적 관점에서 본 民間社會의 궤적
백영서
아시아문화
1994
.12
[기고] 현 중국지성 5인의 시민사회론 분석
조경란
철학과 현실
2004
.10
근대성 이론의 근본적 재구축 시도 : 김상준, 『맹자의 땀, 성왕의 피: 중층근대와 동아시아 유교문명』, 아카넷, 2011
전성우
사회와이론
2012
.05
칼 포퍼의 헤겔 비판과 헤겔 사회ㆍ정치철학의 근본특성에 대하여
나종석
사회와 철학
2005
.10
헤겔의 주체: “부정적인 것에 머무르기” : 지젝의 헤겔 해석을 중심으로
성창기
철학사상
2012
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-001-001215485