지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The market participants have influenced the rule-making process since 1997. The main concerns of legal scholars on the reorganization system has been developing the system of corporate merger into more reasonable and cost-effective one. Under these thoughts, a number of provisions of the Commercial Act of Korea on the corporate reorganization, including merger in particular, has been continuously amended and added. For example, the provisions of division and merger through division of the company were introduced. Also, adding to traditional merger, simplified merger and small-scale merger were adopted as another type of merger.
I think the legal system of M&A involves many issues to be examined thoroughly in various aspects. Despite the significant transformation in the corporate reorganization area, at this point it is still hard to evaluate that the legal system is sophisticated enough to address every details of relevant issues.
In this paper, I focused on reviewing the issue of creditors" protection in the merger procedure from the legislative perspective. First, I gave an overview of the Korean M&A market and the way its legal system has developed during the past 10 years. We can observe that legal system of M&A in Korea has been immensely influenced by the change of economic environment. Then I explained the provisions of the Commercial Act on the creditors" protection in the merger procedures, and reviewed some problems they have. Those creditor protection provisions needs improvement, reflecting the newly emerging market of corporate division and merger. The possible conflicts among new and old statutory provisions should be considered as well.
Even though considerable amendments have been made to the Commercial Act concerning creditor’s protection, there still remains several problems that need to be resolved. The statutory provisions on creditors" protection were adopted at the very time when the Commercial Act of Korea was first enacted and the half century has been passed since then. Still, the statutory provisions regarding creditors of mergers have been very slightly changed. As the creditors should be better protected, it is of great importance to modernize creditors" protection procedure in accordance with the rapid change in the M&A legislature.
I think the legal system of M&A involves many issues to be examined thoroughly in various aspects. Despite the significant transformation in the corporate reorganization area, at this point it is still hard to evaluate that the legal system is sophisticated enough to address every details of relevant issues.
In this paper, I focused on reviewing the issue of creditors" protection in the merger procedure from the legislative perspective. First, I gave an overview of the Korean M&A market and the way its legal system has developed during the past 10 years. We can observe that legal system of M&A in Korea has been immensely influenced by the change of economic environment. Then I explained the provisions of the Commercial Act on the creditors" protection in the merger procedures, and reviewed some problems they have. Those creditor protection provisions needs improvement, reflecting the newly emerging market of corporate division and merger. The possible conflicts among new and old statutory provisions should be considered as well.
Even though considerable amendments have been made to the Commercial Act concerning creditor’s protection, there still remains several problems that need to be resolved. The statutory provisions on creditors" protection were adopted at the very time when the Commercial Act of Korea was first enacted and the half century has been passed since then. Still, the statutory provisions regarding creditors of mergers have been very slightly changed. As the creditors should be better protected, it is of great importance to modernize creditors" protection procedure in accordance with the rapid change in the M&A legislature.
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 합병제도와 채권자보호절차
Ⅲ. 채권자보호를 요하는 합병절차
Ⅳ. 합병시 채권자보호절차의 입법론적 검토
Ⅴ. 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (29)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 권기범 / 1998 / 기업구조조정법 / 삼지원
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권재열 / 2010 / 현행 상법상 주식소각제도의 문제점 및 개선방안 / 상사법연구 29 (3) : 49 ~ 83
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김재형 / 2004 / 미국에서 합병대가의 유연화와 소수주주축출에 관한 입법의 변천과 법원의 대응 / 기업법연구 18 (1) : 57 ~ 74
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박우호 / 2005 / 회사 분할시 채권자보호절차 위반의 효과 / 판례연구 19 (1)
5. [단행본] - 박춘성 / 2006 / 합병 및 분할과 신용평가(평가방법자료) / (주)한국신용평가
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권재열 / 2010 / 현행 상법상 주식소각제도의 문제점 및 개선방안 / 상사법연구 29 (3) : 49 ~ 83
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김재형 / 2004 / 미국에서 합병대가의 유연화와 소수주주축출에 관한 입법의 변천과 법원의 대응 / 기업법연구 18 (1) : 57 ~ 74
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박우호 / 2005 / 회사 분할시 채권자보호절차 위반의 효과 / 판례연구 19 (1)
5. [단행본] - 박춘성 / 2006 / 합병 및 분할과 신용평가(평가방법자료) / (주)한국신용평가
이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)
-
대법원 2004. 8. 30. 선고 2003다25973 판결
[1] 상법은 회사가 분할되고 분할되는 회사가 분할 후에도 존속하는 경우에, 특별한 사정이 없는 한 회사의 책임재산은 분할되는 회사와 신설회사의 소유로 분리되는 것이 일반적이므로 분할 전 회사의 채권자를 보호하기 위하여 분할되는 회사와 신설회사가 분할 전의 회사채무에 관하여 연대책임을 지는 것을 원칙으로 하고, 이 경우에는 회사가 분할되더라
자세히 보기
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-001389568