메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이종수 (단국대학교)
저널정보
동북아역사재단 동북아역사논총 동북아역사논총 44호
발행연도
2014.6
수록면
65 - 94 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the early second century BCE, Wiman deposed King Jun and established Wiman Joseon(衛滿朝鮮) upon the power base of Chinese immigrants. Critical for grasping the culture of Wiman Joseon is understanding the material culture, in particular, the burial remains, of immigrants, who played a crucial role in deposing the king of Gojoseon. Because Chinese immigrants were closely connected with the Yan state, it is important to review the Yan(燕) remains in the plain area of Liaohe(遼河) in order so to better understand the cultural amalgamation that occurred.
Of 41 known areas of Yan remains, only 10 have been excavated. Six of the most significant remains for Wiman Joseon are located on the Liaohe plain: Yangpingcheng(襄平城), Xiwangzimu(徐往子墓), Wangshuidaimu(望水臺墓), Shenyang gugong dixia guchengzhi(沈陽故宮地下古城址), Renaolumu(熱?路墓), and Xinguangmu(新光墓). These remains were formed in the middle of China’s Warring States Period(戰國時代). Jinkai was connected with the expansion of Liaodong(遼東). The period of Xinchengmu(新城墓) was relevant to the late Warring States Period and the early Han Dynasty. From differences in terms of the location and construction methods at burial sites, we can deduce that the body discovered in the tomb was not a Yan officer, but rather a leader of Chinese immigrants in the Qin Dynasty.
The Qiutaiyizhi(邱台遺址) and the Erlonghuchengzhi(二龍湖城址) in the northern Liaodong region are just as difficult to understand as the remains of Yan because the castle’s construction method and arrangement clearly show the association of Zhungyuan and indigenous
cultures. After Yan immigrants settled in the upper region of the Liaoho River, these remains were built in the process of bringing Yan and indigenous cultures together. This association of Yan and indigenous cultures is the product of the coexistence of the two cultures and the conflict between Chinese immigrants and indigenous groups.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 유적 현황
Ⅲ. 유적의 특징과 편년
Ⅳ. 유적의 성격과 유이민 집단과의 관계
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-001692884