지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article focuses on ‘The Treaty limits at the three opening ports’ which was established in Joseon for regulating Japanese people’s moving outside. It contains background of making regulation and operating conditions, in particular, taking note of the casualty accident that occurred to Japanese who had entered Anbyeon(安邊) illegally in March, 1882.
The process of solving this accident represented how to recognize the regulation and response to violation cases concerning ‘The Treaty limits’ in the early period of opening ports between Joseon and Japan. By examining materials and trials cases related to ‘The Treaty limits’, the logic and the mechanism of consular jurisdiction operated by Japan could be explained concretely.
Of course, government of Meiji Japan made rules of regulations based on actual necessities of controlling their nationals and an awareness of world public opinion since modifying regulations and operating consular jurisdiction predicated on treaties and laws were civilized standards. However, there were many exceptional cases for them on results of consular jurisdiction in Joseon. For example, one who had committed ‘The Treaty limits’ and surrendered oneself to justice was commuted by Clause 85 of Meiji Criminal law, finally being sentenced a comparatively small fine. Japan’s legislation and management of regulation for ‘The Treaty limits’ show the process of creating logic for protection of its native people. On the other hand, it means that Japan assured their superiority to Joseon on the level of civilization, leading to justifying their actions during overseas expansion.
The process of solving this accident represented how to recognize the regulation and response to violation cases concerning ‘The Treaty limits’ in the early period of opening ports between Joseon and Japan. By examining materials and trials cases related to ‘The Treaty limits’, the logic and the mechanism of consular jurisdiction operated by Japan could be explained concretely.
Of course, government of Meiji Japan made rules of regulations based on actual necessities of controlling their nationals and an awareness of world public opinion since modifying regulations and operating consular jurisdiction predicated on treaties and laws were civilized standards. However, there were many exceptional cases for them on results of consular jurisdiction in Joseon. For example, one who had committed ‘The Treaty limits’ and surrendered oneself to justice was commuted by Clause 85 of Meiji Criminal law, finally being sentenced a comparatively small fine. Japan’s legislation and management of regulation for ‘The Treaty limits’ show the process of creating logic for protection of its native people. On the other hand, it means that Japan assured their superiority to Joseon on the level of civilization, leading to justifying their actions during overseas expansion.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ.「조일수호조규」 체결 후 ‘間行里程’의 설정과 일본인의 원산 진출
Ⅲ. 안변 지역 살상사건의 발생과 조일 양국의 대응
Ⅳ. 임오군란 이후 일본인 단속규칙의 제정과 운영
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-001668342