지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The competition between South Korea and North Korea during the Cold War period focused on remaking human of people beyond a simple institutional level. Such competition became appearance at the late 1950s until the early 1960s at a time when full range of competition on communistic/ capitalistic industrialization.
In 1958 North Korea completed the restoration after war and the foundation of socialism and began to create ‘labouringng people’ as a communistic type of human. At almost similar period South Korea spread out narratives like ‘remaking human’ and ‘remaking nation’. The military regime of Park Jung Hee put economic reconstruction and remaking human as the two tasks after 5?16 coup d"etat.
The two regimes blamed each other arguing the opposite regime’s policy was not desirable. Despite such mutual criticism, the logics of remaking human of the two governments ares very similar. Both criticized the playful lives of the public, which were derived from the noble ruling class culture of Joseon, and aimed to create modern type human focusing on labor and
technology.
Main differences of remaking human in the two regimes lie not in the ideal or logic but in the ‘method’. North Korea sought communistic human reconstruction by means of Chunlima working group movement, and weighted high on the method of influence by means of ‘positive cultivation’. This method played an effective role in inducing the loyalty to the state and the communist party through ‘action’ by stimulating mentality of the public who were in full of disbelief due to impoverishment of war and widespread purge.To the contrary, the military government in South Korea more focused on education which was cultural approach. National movement method was also adopted, but it failed to be effective.
In 1958 North Korea completed the restoration after war and the foundation of socialism and began to create ‘labouringng people’ as a communistic type of human. At almost similar period South Korea spread out narratives like ‘remaking human’ and ‘remaking nation’. The military regime of Park Jung Hee put economic reconstruction and remaking human as the two tasks after 5?16 coup d"etat.
The two regimes blamed each other arguing the opposite regime’s policy was not desirable. Despite such mutual criticism, the logics of remaking human of the two governments ares very similar. Both criticized the playful lives of the public, which were derived from the noble ruling class culture of Joseon, and aimed to create modern type human focusing on labor and
technology.
Main differences of remaking human in the two regimes lie not in the ideal or logic but in the ‘method’. North Korea sought communistic human reconstruction by means of Chunlima working group movement, and weighted high on the method of influence by means of ‘positive cultivation’. This method played an effective role in inducing the loyalty to the state and the communist party through ‘action’ by stimulating mentality of the public who were in full of disbelief due to impoverishment of war and widespread purge.To the contrary, the military government in South Korea more focused on education which was cultural approach. National movement method was also adopted, but it failed to be effective.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 남북간 인간개조 경쟁의 역사적 맥락
Ⅲ. 1960년 전후 남북의 국민/인민 개조논리 비교
Ⅳ. 북한의 노동과 긍정교양을 통한 개조작업
Ⅴ. 남한의 교육을 통한 인간개조운동
Ⅵ. 결론
<참고문헌>
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-900-001610908