지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
For Chinese students learning Korean, passive sentences in Korean are one of the most difficult grammatical features. To explicate the difficulty among Chinese students of Korean, this paper contrasts the most representative Korean derivative passive sentence with the Chinese bei-sentence as a passive sentence. Before the contrast, this paper explained the concept and range of the two passive sentences. This paper was intended to comparatively analyses four kinds of essential components of the passive, and made an attempt to find similarities and differences of the four components between Korean and Chinese. Furthermore, this paper made an attempt to achieve a concrete analysis that could explain the sharing characteristics between Korean derivative passive sentence and Chinese bei-sentence. It seems that there is no one-to-one correspondence between the two passive sentences. On the basis of the analysis, the author of this paper argues that the explanation and contrastive analysis could contribute to the understanding of similarities and differences between the two languages. Especially, the understanding could surely help Chinese students of Korean learn most difficult grammatical features of Korean.
목차
1. 서론
2. 한국어 피동의 개념 및 범위
3. 중국어 피동의 개념 및 범위
4. 파생적 피동문과 ‘被’자문 구조 성분의 대조
5. 파생적 피동문과 ‘被’자문 통사적 구조의 대응
6. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (32)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-700-002498200