개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The need for writing education is stressed in Korea. ‘Writing’ is fixed as a formal lecture in many universities. The aims of this article are diagnosis and treatment of wrong sentences in writings written by Korean university students. Basic materials are writings of students who are in three universities in and around Daegu. They were written as large as 250 letters in a paragraph. The items for statistic processing were paragraphs, sentences and words from basic data that are consist of seven sets.
The primary purpose of this study is to know the real state of mistakes in sentences that 13th grade students use. I investigated percentages and patterns of wrong sentences from database that are consist of units of paragraphs written by students in three universities. I classified examples of mistakes according to patterns and made these as basic materials for making the wiring directing program. And, I established basic data for percentage of patterns and degree of mistakes by proportion of right answers in examinations for check up the ability of diagnosis and correction of wrong sentences.
The degree of mistakes in sentences were not changed in groups who were not taken corrections and decreased in groups who were taken corrections. The conclusion of that personal correction is most effective directing method was derived from this. And, the percentage of wrong sentences according to patterns were also correlated in comparison of proportion of right answers in two groups. The proportion of right answers can used as a guideline for important directing point because the mistakes that were not picked out in "reading" are repeated in ‘writing’.
The primary purpose of this study is to know the real state of mistakes in sentences that 13th grade students use. I investigated percentages and patterns of wrong sentences from database that are consist of units of paragraphs written by students in three universities. I classified examples of mistakes according to patterns and made these as basic materials for making the wiring directing program. And, I established basic data for percentage of patterns and degree of mistakes by proportion of right answers in examinations for check up the ability of diagnosis and correction of wrong sentences.
The degree of mistakes in sentences were not changed in groups who were not taken corrections and decreased in groups who were taken corrections. The conclusion of that personal correction is most effective directing method was derived from this. And, the percentage of wrong sentences according to patterns were also correlated in comparison of proportion of right answers in two groups. The proportion of right answers can used as a guideline for important directing point because the mistakes that were not picked out in "reading" are repeated in ‘writing’.
목차
1. 서론
2. 오류의 비율과 의미
3. 정답률과 지도 항목
4. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
대학생 말하기 교육의 현황과 개선 방안
전은진
인문과학연구
2012
.03
대학 독서 토론 교육의 모형 연구 : 텍스트 읽기, 말하기, 쓰기 통합 모형을 중심으로
김양선
인문과학연구
2009
.12
대학 글쓰기 교재에 나타난 창의적 글쓰기의 양상과 수업 방법 탐색
김문희
인문과학연구
2015
.03
자아 성찰적 글쓰기의 교육 내용과 교수·학습 사례 분석 : 대구대 공통교양 「글쓰기와 커뮤니케이션」을 중심으로
박호관
우리말글
2014
.12
자기 성찰적 글쓰기 방안 모색 연구 : 자기 소개서 쓰기 지도를 중심으로
김춘규
어문학
2014
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-700-002838233