지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since the modern times, the ground to compare Korea and China has been extensively laid aside from their influence on each other, and there has been quite a lot of fruition from Korean and Chinese novels. In consideration of the historical situation and the general environment of the society after the liberation, they have coexisted sharing a long period of historic tradition in the same Confucian culture as neighboring countries though there may have been some time difference; therefore, in a comparative study on Korean and Chinese poems, too, it is needed to examine the social discourses that the poets were in beforehand. Despite the familiar topic of ‘resistance poetry’, in the history of our literature, the resistance discourses have been developed mainly with discussions over postcolonialism after the liberation. Along with the emergence of engagement literature, the 1960’s was the time full of heat for pureㆍparticipatory disputes, and basically, the participation of intellects was taken as the theme of those disputes. The people’s literature appearing after then included the people such as farmers and laborers, so we can see that the range of resistant subjects was more extended from that of engagement literature. This article is intended to include the two into the range of ‘resistance literature’ from a macroscopic perspective.
The first reason why this study compares Kim Jiha with Beidao is that from a broad point of view, they approached it with the principles and spirit of traditional literature unlike the poets of modernism, the mainstream of resistance poetry. The second reason is that their narratives are not limited to a certain era but circulate with a diachronic chain. The third reason is that the narrative taking death as its theme supposes the poetic speaker’s ‘martyrdom’ and ‘sacrifice’. Lastly, the fourth reason is that poetic words like ‘the sun’ or ‘land’ appearing in their poems are used as the crucial symbols of the historical background in the poems.
The first reason why this study compares Kim Jiha with Beidao is that from a broad point of view, they approached it with the principles and spirit of traditional literature unlike the poets of modernism, the mainstream of resistance poetry. The second reason is that their narratives are not limited to a certain era but circulate with a diachronic chain. The third reason is that the narrative taking death as its theme supposes the poetic speaker’s ‘martyrdom’ and ‘sacrifice’. Lastly, the fourth reason is that poetic words like ‘the sun’ or ‘land’ appearing in their poems are used as the crucial symbols of the historical background in the poems.
목차
1. 서론
2. 한ㆍ중 저항시인 김지하와 쟝허
3. ‘죽음’의 모티브를 통해 드러난 저항주체의 공통점과 차이점
4. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-001-001114552