개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Peasants’ War in 1894 is generally evaluated by anti-feudalism and anti-imperialist national movement. For the researchers, there are focused on the correlation of the Gabo Reform as well as reform of the peasants rebellion on the idea of Peasant War. The focus were to analyze the modifications described in jipgangso(執綱所) Code 12 in “donghaksa” of Oh Ji-young about the proposals of reform plan of peasants soldiers. Han Woo-geun has analyzed the different types of reform’s proposal on the overall tax system in the Joseon Dynasty. But he can’t recognize also that the Peseants have developed into a fundamental problem with the needs while their overcoming a reasonable tax administration reform and a privileged tax system.
Let’s look for the relevance with the Gabo Reform. Deliberative Council in the Gabo Reform tried to implement the overall reform agenda from the end of June to early July. However peasant’s soldiers was trying to break the social order leveling villages society directly and was trying to achieve the status of a equalized society. On the other hand, Gabo regime was trying to redirect the gradual dismantling the slave system agent in uncompromising stance with Yanban system. And they did not yet to reform tax system, moreover, also were trying to keep intact while holding the tenant famer system in Gungbang lands and national land.
Accordingly, conflicts of peasant’s soldiers and Gabo regime was deepened gradually. On september 1894 Gabo regime is scrambling to suppress joined the Japanese military to oppress peasants soldiers. They had forced suppression requirements, decisively after the hardline policies Subjugation of coercion by the Japanese army.
Gabo Regime was punished also by the laws of the trial to peasant’s soldiers. but they did not impose Jeon Bong-jun(全琫準) as a crime for anti-imperialist movement against Japanese aggression. And Gabo Regime excluded them in the implementation of modern justice system. For the future, a study on the reality of peasants reform is expected to rediscover newly through farmers’ discourse understanding and development of research methodology on the trial-related materials of peasant war.
Let’s look for the relevance with the Gabo Reform. Deliberative Council in the Gabo Reform tried to implement the overall reform agenda from the end of June to early July. However peasant’s soldiers was trying to break the social order leveling villages society directly and was trying to achieve the status of a equalized society. On the other hand, Gabo regime was trying to redirect the gradual dismantling the slave system agent in uncompromising stance with Yanban system. And they did not yet to reform tax system, moreover, also were trying to keep intact while holding the tenant famer system in Gungbang lands and national land.
Accordingly, conflicts of peasant’s soldiers and Gabo regime was deepened gradually. On september 1894 Gabo regime is scrambling to suppress joined the Japanese military to oppress peasants soldiers. They had forced suppression requirements, decisively after the hardline policies Subjugation of coercion by the Japanese army.
Gabo Regime was punished also by the laws of the trial to peasant’s soldiers. but they did not impose Jeon Bong-jun(全琫準) as a crime for anti-imperialist movement against Japanese aggression. And Gabo Regime excluded them in the implementation of modern justice system. For the future, a study on the reality of peasants reform is expected to rediscover newly through farmers’ discourse understanding and development of research methodology on the trial-related materials of peasant war.
목차
머리말
Ⅰ. 농민군의 폐정개혁안 제기
Ⅱ. 갑오개혁과 농민군 개혁의 수용 문제
Ⅲ. 갑오개혁과 농민군의 대립적 성격
맺음말
[ABSTRACT]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-911-001273477