메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Douglas Roland Campbell (University of Toronto)
저널정보
한국분석철학회 철학적분석 철학적분석 제31호
발행연도
2014.12
수록면
27 - 47 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this essay, I argue that one’s intuitions about evidence require that only what is true be counted as evidence. I present this prima facie case for a truth requirement on evidence in a few steps. First, I begin by outlining exactly what is, intuitively, expected of evidence. Then, I offer an exposition of two competing views. The first respects a truth requirement; the second does not. After this exposition, I argue that the second is beset by conflicts with one’s intuitions. I additionally argue that the second cannot perform a large majority of the tasks intuitively demanded of evidence that I outlined earlier in the essay. The first view is not met with any of these problems. The results generalize: accounts that omit a truth requirement oppose one’s intuitions. Lastly, I present a case in which there, intuitively, seems to be false evidence, and then I argue that it does not, in truth, pose a threat to this view.

목차

Ⅰ. The Functions of Evidence
Ⅱ. The Exposition of E = K
Ⅲ. The Exposition of E = NPJ
Ⅳ. To the extent that E = NPJ does not observe a truth requirement on evidence, unintuitive facts are true of one’sset of evidence
Ⅴ. To the extent that E = NPJ does not observe a truth requirement on evidence, it no longer performs the tasks thatone, intuitively, asks evidence to perform
Ⅵ. Presentation of an alleged counter-example and a reply
Ⅶ. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (8)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-160-001317553