지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
How similar are Manchu and Mongolian words? This simple question made the writer search resemblances between them from the available data. Seeing that these languages began to be studied genealogically after the birth of modern comparative linguistics, the writer, struggling some years for rearranging Manchu?Mongol vocabulary in the Qingwenjian’s, was easily led to the question in this paper of how they recognized the differences between their languages in the 18th century.
Having assumed that “Yuzhi-manzhu-menggu-hanzi-sanhe-qieyin-qingwenjian (御製滿珠蒙古漢字三合切音淸文鑑)” should reflect their intuition soundly, he tried to compare the words in the basic vocabulary list of 100, which is well ?known in this academic world. Ignorance of some differences in the researchers’ opinion has led him to follow Rozycki’s (1984, 1994) in the interpretation.
As the result, only six out of 100 basic words were confirmed to show sound correspondences owing to their genetic relationship. Many of the Manchu?Mongol words resemble each other seemingly, but decent number of them were sure to turn out to be loan?words in comparativists’ point of view. Direction of borrowing is mostly from Mongolian to Manchu. Considering that the two nations have been in close contact with each other for quite a long time, we’d better assume that the borrowing has taken place cumulatively over several times.
However, it’s worth to point out as a problem that we can find but a few doublets so that borrowed words are not of enough number to be regarded to have completely replaced the proper ones. To take a familiar example, more than half of the Korean words are borrowed from Chinese but corresponding native ones are still in use.(Eg. daek(<Ch. 宅‘zhai’) is a loan word from Chinese but jip “home” is still used in Korean.) English, borrowing a lot of Latin or French words, is no exception. In this respect, problem of genealogical relationship and borrowing between Manchu and Mongolian needs to be studied in more depth.
The vocabulary is dealt with in this paper, but grammatical structure and morphology are also essential for the comparative study in view of the linguistic genealogy. These studies are left for the future to be challenged.
Having assumed that “Yuzhi-manzhu-menggu-hanzi-sanhe-qieyin-qingwenjian (御製滿珠蒙古漢字三合切音淸文鑑)” should reflect their intuition soundly, he tried to compare the words in the basic vocabulary list of 100, which is well ?known in this academic world. Ignorance of some differences in the researchers’ opinion has led him to follow Rozycki’s (1984, 1994) in the interpretation.
As the result, only six out of 100 basic words were confirmed to show sound correspondences owing to their genetic relationship. Many of the Manchu?Mongol words resemble each other seemingly, but decent number of them were sure to turn out to be loan?words in comparativists’ point of view. Direction of borrowing is mostly from Mongolian to Manchu. Considering that the two nations have been in close contact with each other for quite a long time, we’d better assume that the borrowing has taken place cumulatively over several times.
However, it’s worth to point out as a problem that we can find but a few doublets so that borrowed words are not of enough number to be regarded to have completely replaced the proper ones. To take a familiar example, more than half of the Korean words are borrowed from Chinese but corresponding native ones are still in use.(Eg. daek(<Ch. 宅‘zhai’) is a loan word from Chinese but jip “home” is still used in Korean.) English, borrowing a lot of Latin or French words, is no exception. In this respect, problem of genealogical relationship and borrowing between Manchu and Mongolian needs to be studied in more depth.
The vocabulary is dealt with in this paper, but grammatical structure and morphology are also essential for the comparative study in view of the linguistic genealogy. These studies are left for the future to be challenged.
목차
1. 들어가기
2. 알타이제어 간의 유사성
3. 《御製滿珠蒙古漢字三合切音淸文鑑》에 대하여
4. 만주어 몽골어 어휘의 비교(기본 어휘)
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『만독사전』(2007)의 만주어 혼성어 분석 오류 고찰―『어제증정청문감』의 뜻풀이를 중심으로―
민족문화연구
2021 .08
-
御製淸文鑑 「時令部」 校勘 및 譯註 硏究(2)
인문학연구
2015 .01
-
『御製增訂淸文鑑』만주어의 형태 분석 1―동사형을 중심으로―
민족문화연구
2021 .08
-
조선 지식인들의 淸代 滿洲語 수용 연구
한국실학연구
2015 .01
-
‘-子’계열 한자어에서 기원한 만주어 ‘-se’계열 단어에 대한 연구 - HMB『( 御製淸文鑑』)에 등재된 어휘를 중심으로 -
인문학연구
2020 .01
-
《御製增訂淸文鑑》 신규 표제어 연구
알타이학보
2017 .01
-
문어몽골어의 소위 전통전사에 대하여
언어학
2018 .12
-
淸文鑑類 만주어 사전의 성립과 전파, 그리고 동아시아적 변용
인문학연구
2020 .01
-
만주어 방향어의 의미 확장 연구 - 『御製增訂淸文鑑』의 만주어 뜻풀이를 중심으로 -
인문학연구
2020 .01
-
≪漢淸文鑑≫ 滿文 詮釋의 변개 양상
언어학
2015 .12
-
<삼학역어(三學譯語)>의 만주어
알타이학보
2023 .06
-
古代满蒙语言接触历程探究
알타이학보
2020 .01
-
≪御製淸文鑑≫ 동사류 표제어의 상 부류
언어학
2015 .12
-
≪漢淸文鑑≫의 뜻풀이 유형
한국사전학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2016 .02
-
한국어-몽골어-만주어의 도구격 표지 기능 비교
알타이학보
2022 .06
-
‘≪漢淸文鑑≫의 뜻풀이 유형’에 대한 토론문
한국사전학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2016 .02
-
만주어 표기에 반영된 만주어와 한어의 구개음화
언어학
2018 .04
-
<청문감류>의 ‘질병’ 관련 어휘 부류의 연구
민족문화연구
2021 .08
-
『漢淸文鑑』 체재의 사전학적 연구
한국언어학회 학술대회지
2016 .06
-
만주어 조어법 연구- 御製淸文鑑의 어휘를 중심으로
민족문화연구
2016 .01
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-710-001309299