메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기독교학회 한국기독교신학논총 한국기독교신학논총 제27집
발행연도
2003.1
수록면
5 - 38 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to investigate ancient Near Eastern and Israelite judiciary systems and roles of judges and kind of courts and process of jurisdiction by biblical, ancient Near Eastern and rabbinic sources. Till now, despite of importance of the judiciary system, we do not have comprehensive works on the judiciary system in ancient Near East and Israel. In old Testament, Moses sat as a magistrate among the people (Ex. 18:13) and, either on the advice of Jethro, his father-in-law (Ex. 18:17-23), or on his own initiative (Deut. 1:9-14), he later delegated his judicial powers to appointed “chiefs of thousands, hundreds, fifties, and tens” (Ex. 18:21, Deut. 1:15) - reserving to himself jurisdiction in only the most difficult, major disputes (Ex. 18:22 and 26, Deut. 1:17). After establishment of kingdom, professional judges called ??? and the men called ??? served as judge in court (Deut. 16:18). In Jehoshapat`s reign, Levites, priests and elders played an important role in judging. As like, high officers served as judges in Assyrian court (BM 123360). As a result professional judges and other officials who were concerned participated in judgment. The judicial qualifications have been enumerated as follows: judges must be able men (?????), such as fear God (????-??), men of truth (???-??), hating covetousness (??-??); wise (???) and sensible, learned in the law and full of knowledge in company, and speak kindly to people; he must be very strict with himself and conquer lustful impulses; he must have a courageous heart to save the oppressed from the oppressor`s hate, cruelty, and persecution, and eschew wrong and injustice (Ex. 18:21, Deut. 1:13). Using the rabbinic jurisdiction of courts, we reconstruct kind of court. We assume that there were three courts in ancient Israel as follows. ⑴ Courts of three judges exercised jurisdiction in civil matters. ⑵ Courts of 23 judges exercised jurisdiction in criminal matters generally. ⑶ The court of 71 judges had practically unlimited judicial, legislative, and administrative powers but certain judicial and administrative functions were reserved to it alone. In ancient Israel, there were courts in Jerusalem as well as each province. Just Old Testament describes procedure of decision in ancient Israel (Ruth 4:1-12, Jeremiah 26). Court usually hold at city gate. A judge must show patience, indulgence, humility, and respect for persons when sitting in court; he must always hear both parties to the case; he may not in any way discriminate between the parties (Lev. 19;15); nor may he act under the possible pressures of any undue influence, including bribery by money or by words (Deut. 16:19); he must, on the one hand, proceed with deliberation and care, and reconsider again and again before finally pronouncing his verdict but may not, on the other hand, unduly delay justice; and he must so conduct himself that justice is not only done but is also manifestly seen to be done and readily understood by the litigants. Before joining a court, a judge must satisfy himself that the judges sitting with him are properly qualified; and no judge should sit together with another judge whom he hates or despites. Nor may a judge-especially in criminal cases-instead of considering and deciding the issue before him on his own, rely on the opinion of greater judges in the court and try thus to disburden himself of his judicial responsibility. However, Israelite judges were corrupted by bribe. They asked for a reward (Micah 7:3, Hosea 10:3-4). One of the important is that we cannot find death penalty in ancient Near Eastern judiciary documents. However, in Israel Naboth was died by impartial judgment. It is because Israelite law is more religious than other ancient Near Eastern laws.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0