It is not easy to treat the issue on homosexuality in the context of Korean church as a pastor and theologian. Conservative people think that it is unnecessary to study on homosexuality or try to understand gay or lesbian, because they believe the Bible clearly condemns them. On the other hand, liberal people think that it is necessary to reinterpret the Bible verses on homosexuality, because they are out of date and can`t be used literally any more in contemporary situation. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to make an desirable ethical norm on homosexuality and to suggest effective methods to care for homosexuals from the viewpoint of pastoral counseling. For this purpose, first part shows how the views on homosexuality have been changed in world history. Even though there were times when homosexuality was accepted as natural in some Asian cultures or ancient Greek. in most of times in history, homosexuality was condemned as sinful action because of influence of Christianity. Recently the decision of American Psychiatric Association(in 1973) played a decisive role to change people`s attitude toward homosexuality. The meaning of this decision and that how the church`s attitude is changed after that is explained. Also homosexual groups and their influences in Korea are introduced. Even though many people talk on the issue of transgender or homosexuality freely, and talk about their rights, it is still difficult for homosexuals to confess their own sexual identity (“coming out”) because church as well as society is not ready to accept them as they are. In part Ⅱ, Christian view on homosexuality is analyzed in two ways: first, traditional negative view on homosexuality as sin, and second, new approach to the homosexuality in positive way. Specific texts of the Bible, traditionally used to demonstrate the immorality of homosexual activity are followings: Gen. 19:1-11, Leviticus 18:22, 20:13, Rom. 1:18-32, 1 Cor. 6:9, 1 Tim. 1:8-11, And Thomas Aquinas whose negative understanding on homosexuality influenced strongly on churches` understanding because of his great theological works, and many scholars who object homosexuality are introduced. With the tool of Biblical criticism, however, many scholars began to reinterpret the Bible verses on homosexuality. They focus on historic-cultural background and context of the Bible, and believe that Biblical description of sex which was related mainly with childbirth must be reinterpreted and those Biblical views can`t be used literally today. Several examples in the Bible were explained from this new viewpoint. Part Ⅲ discusses about a desirable ethical norm on homosexuality from the critical dialogue between traditional view and contemporary social sciences` views. J. Adams strongly asserts that homosexuality is sin and the cure is possible only when they recognize it. And it should be noted that whenever homosexual activity is described in the Bible it is condemned, even though there is no specific instance in which a homosexual person is condemned. But, many scholars believe that the phenomenon of homosexuality is universal, so we have to accept it something natural. For this, comparative cultural approach, and statistical study on homosexuals are used. On the critical dialogue between traditionally held moral norms and findings of social sciences such as psychology, sociology, and the like, homosexuality is viewed as something not to be condemned but also not normal activity. On the basis of this study, methods to care for homosexuals are discussed. The empathy is necessary to lead counseling effectively. It is not desirable for Counselor to try, in the first step, to change their homosexual desire or concern, but to accept them as they are. They feel too much stress in this society which has a strong prejudice against homosexuals. But, this article suggests that they need to change their view from homosexuality to heterosexuality, because homosexuality can`t be normal a