메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기독교학회 한국기독교신학논총 한국기독교신학논총 제80집
발행연도
2012.4
수록면
277 - 301 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper mainly intends to analyze the critical discussion between Max L. Stackhouse and Stanley Hauerwas who are the two of the leading Christian ethicists for today. While the former has been the main figure of public theology, the latter has focused on a so-called ecclesial ethic. According to Stackhouse, Christian theology must be a public theology in two senses. First, a public theology becomes an apologetics because theology must engage the conversation with the other fields of science and even with other religions. Second, a public theology has to be a social ethic seeking for the first principles which are universal. Unlike Stackhouse, Hauerwas argues that theology begins from the Church and ends in the Church. Thus, his motto is “let the church be the church.” This claim mainly means that the church must be an alternative community of nonviolence to the world full of violence and war. For Stackhouse, Hauerwas`s ecclesial ethic results in a sectarian theology mainly for two reasons. First, his ecclesial ethic becomes theology without common reason because it only focuses on the church. Second, it overlooks the fact that God is the lord both of the church and the world. According to Hauerwas, on the while, Stackhouse`s public theology becomes a liberal theology which serves the world, losing its own distinct voice. The paper comes to a conclusion that the church needs the sensitiveness both to its public responsibility and its ecclesial identity.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0