지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The existing researches on the policy of the ancient Roman empire against the near eastargues that the policy was defensive in nature. But I would rather emphasize the policy was aggressive and offensive. When Roman emperors started the war with hostile countries near them, they mobilized their own forces stationed nearby as well as allied forces from far away country to stage the all-out war. They would not tolerate the failure in the war, but enhanced their pride through maintaining the hegemony by winning in the war. In thisrespect, they were always aggressive and offensive to win the war. Though the Julio-Claudian and Flavian dynasty had sustained intermittently peaceful period with the hostile neighboring countries, it was just a temporary period.
The Roman imperial wars with states in neareast were fought in large areas than any other wars the Romans fought. Roman emperors tried to keep the strong boundaries tightly controlled by the central government. Since the latter part of the second century, the system of client-kingdom which served as buffer states to stop the Parthian Empire disappeared. the people in those areas were subject to the direct control of Rome.
This study shows the general tendency reflected in the individual incidents and wars in the neareast during the Julio-Claudian and Flavian dynasty before the third century. As the individual historical incidents occurred under the different situations and backgrounds, the military policy adopted by the Roman emperors were diverse. The diverse historical realities at the times of the succession of each emperor played a key role in the policy making processes of the emperor.
Before the third century, with some differences in each emperor, there was consistency in Roman empire"s near east policy. Roman empire, per se, maintained expansion of the empire based on keeping hegemony.
The Roman imperial wars with states in neareast were fought in large areas than any other wars the Romans fought. Roman emperors tried to keep the strong boundaries tightly controlled by the central government. Since the latter part of the second century, the system of client-kingdom which served as buffer states to stop the Parthian Empire disappeared. the people in those areas were subject to the direct control of Rome.
This study shows the general tendency reflected in the individual incidents and wars in the neareast during the Julio-Claudian and Flavian dynasty before the third century. As the individual historical incidents occurred under the different situations and backgrounds, the military policy adopted by the Roman emperors were diverse. The diverse historical realities at the times of the succession of each emperor played a key role in the policy making processes of the emperor.
Before the third century, with some differences in each emperor, there was consistency in Roman empire"s near east policy. Roman empire, per se, maintained expansion of the empire based on keeping hegemony.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 원수정 초기부터 네로 황제까지 : BC31~AD68
3. 베스파시아누스 황제부터 트라야누스 황제까지 : AD69~117
4. 하드리아누스 황제부터 세베루스 황제까지 : AD118~200
5. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-390-001814575