메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
임용한 (경희대학교)
저널정보
국방부 군사편찬연구소 군사 군사지 제80호
발행연도
2011.9
수록면
67 - 93 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The feature of Joseon"s nation system was the centralization of government. In the military system, the rising of government power increased the duty of remuneration for the killed and wounded. Government invented the new system said Bok-Ho(復戶). Bok-Ho had been made in the late 14th century, when traditional military system that nation gave lands to soldiers award for their service had been collapsed. Government selected indirectly way, exemption of service instead of giving material award. This exemption system was fitted to The New dynasty Joseon"s military system, that had drilling system free from giving land.
Bok-Ho(復戶) system was established by law. It was contained in Gyeongjeyukjeon(經濟六典) and Gyeongukdaeajeon(經國大典)
But compensation was very small,because Joseon"s finance condition was poor. family of a killed only received exemption of military duty for 3 years and 3 seok(石) of rice and bean. Rice and bean were not remuneration but funeral expense.
Bok-Ho(復戶)was exemption of military duty or employment by office. In the Joseon, one man per family had to serve, if family possessed three men who were capable of military service, from 16 to 60 years old. During he served in military, two men staying at home were exempted from another order by office which requisite labor.
Except Bok-Ho(復戶) and funeral expense, Government didn"t approve any material support, and diverting Bok-Ho(復戶) forward financial add.
For instance, at first, Government ordered not to requisite men in Bok-Ho(復戶) family on work for product tributes. Then, from late 15C, product of tributes was changed. Government and people prepared tributes to collect tax, by which Government or officer bought necessary product. Government didn"t approve exemption of this new tax, because this was not labor but money.
In the view of this point, it is difficult to regard Bok-Ho(復戶) as real compensation system. Because even though Bok-Ho(復戶) was not exist, if a man had been killed orwounded,family had no man to serveexcept owing not less than 4men. But family to have more than 4men was a very few. Therefore Bok-Ho(復戶) could not help poor family in finance. Real material help was only funeral expense.

목차

1. 머리말
2. 복호제의 역사적 배경
3. 복호 규정의 정비 과정
4. 복호제의 운영방식과 변화
5. 결론 - 복호제의 의의와 한계
〈ABSTRACT〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-390-001806975