지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the field of criminal law in Korea, the theme of Restrorative Justice has been discussed in earnest from about 2000 year. As one of restrorative judicial means, it has been examined to introduce Compromise Recommendation System on Juvenile delinquency, and in 2007, Compromise Recommendation System has been introduced finally for a restrorative administration of justice through revision of Juvenile Act. Thereafter, concentrating on judgment scholar of juvenile protection and Seoul Family Court being operated under the Supreme Court, it has proceeded to study improvement of judgment for protecting juvenile, and basing on the study result, Compromise Recommendation System has been enforced from 2010 year, as a new attempt at Juvenile judgement. There is necessity that the System which has been introduced to Juvenile Act as one of restrorative justice, enforcing by Family Court through the country, should be concentrated on "conversation and healing" rather than following in "the step of emphasizing clearing problems", in order to harmonize between the peculiarity of Juvenile Act and restrorative judicial spirit. By the way, it looks like as though current compromise recommendation system is being operated orienting on compromise with monetary compensation in order to lower disposition of protected juveniles by three members commissioned by the court, similarly to adjustment of civil affairs. For all of current situation of the system being operated by Seoul Family Court, it takes too longer days and it appears the problem that the cases of enforcing the system is severely smaller comparing to total cases. In order to gain success in Compromise Recommendation System, it seems the moment has come to examine actively shortening the procedure and times of the system, widening the cases applying it and entrusting it to professional compromise advisor or commissioning to outside institute.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (45)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강경래 / 2010 / 소년원 처우의 실효성 확보방안 -8호 처분과 일본의 특수단기처우와의 비교검토를 중심으로- / 소년보호연구 14 : 53 ~ 74
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강동욱 / 2012 / 소년사건 처리절차에 관한 고찰 / 한양법학 23 (4) : 11 ~ 35
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강동욱 / 2009 / 소년사법과 소년범 처리실태에 관한 고찰 / 비교법연구 (12)
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김봉수 / 2013 / 소년범죄의 최근 동향과 대책 / 법학논총 33 (1) : 173 ~ 197
5. [보고서] - 김은경 / 2004 / 각국의 회복적 소년사법 정책동향
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강동욱 / 2012 / 소년사건 처리절차에 관한 고찰 / 한양법학 23 (4) : 11 ~ 35
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강동욱 / 2009 / 소년사법과 소년범 처리실태에 관한 고찰 / 비교법연구 (12)
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김봉수 / 2013 / 소년범죄의 최근 동향과 대책 / 법학논총 33 (1) : 173 ~ 197
5. [보고서] - 김은경 / 2004 / 각국의 회복적 소년사법 정책동향
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002567944