메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Yungchul Kim (Chiba University)
저널정보
한국디자인학회 Archives of Design Research Archives of Design Research Vol.29 No.1
발행연도
2016.2
수록면
47 - 58 (12page)
DOI
10.15187/adr.2016.02.29.1.47

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background : Product choice is not free from the “context of use.” Moreover, the context of use is affected by culture. To further study this concept, this research focused on the relationships among cultural differences, context of use, and product choice associated with air conditioners.
Methods : Japanese and Korean participants responded to the questionnaire, which showed two spaces (houses)—one Japanese and the other Korean. The respondents were asked to purchase air conditioners for each house with a limited budget, choosing from only two types of air conditioners. Furthermore, they had to mark the location in the house where they would want to install the air conditioners. Subsequent items in the questionnaire also asked the respondents how much they agreed with statements that were related to the design of the air conditioner and its secondary functions.
Result : The results demonstrate the differences in the choice of air conditioners between the Korean and Japanese respondents. The choices of the Japanese respondents changed in relation to the room structure, whereas the Korean respondents’ choices did not. Moreover, the two groups of respondents differed in their responses to the air conditioner design-related questions.
Conclusions : The results of this study showed that culture, context of use, and product choice are intertwined. The relationships between product choice and context of use differ according to culture. Furthermore, air conditioners are regarded as a home appliance in Japan, whereas they are considered as furniture in Korea.

목차

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Method
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (5)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-658-002393432